Hu X J, Ticku M K
Department of Pharmacology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1994 Aug;270(2):485-90.
The present study was designed to determine whether chronic benzodiazepine (BZ) agonist treatment alters the "set point" of the BZ pharmacological profile. This was achieved by investigating the modulation of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated [36Cl-] influx by BZ ligands, as well as pentobarbital after chronic flurazepam treatment, in well characterized mammalian cortical neurons. Chronic flurazepam treatment (5 microM, 10 days) produced decreased efficacy of BZ agonists (diazepam and flunitrazepam) and inverse agonists (methyl-6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta-carboline-3'-carboxylate and ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate), as measured by GABA-induced [36Cl-] influx. The chronic flurazepam treatment, although not altering their EC50/IC50 values, decreased the Emax/-Emax values. Furthermore, the decreased efficacy was reversed after a 72-hr withdrawal, and by concomitant exposure of the neurons to Ro15-1788 (ethyl-8-fluoro-5,6-dihydro-5-methyl-6-oxo-4H-imidazo[1,5 alpha][1,4]- BZ-3-carboxylate), a BZ receptor antagonist, but not by R 5135 (3 alpha-hydroxy-16-imino-5 beta-17-androstan-11-one; a GABA receptor antagonist) and pircrotoxin (a channel blocker). The chronic flurazepam treatment also produced uncoupling between pentobarbital and BZ receptor sites, and decreased the efficacy of pentobarbital to enhance GABA-mediated [36Cl-] influx, events also reversed at 72-hr withdrawal and concomitant exposure to Ro15-1788. Chronic flurazepam treatment-induced uncoupling and decreased efficacy of BZ agonists was not reversed by the GABAA receptor antagonist, R 5135, or channel blocker, picrotoxin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究旨在确定慢性苯二氮䓬(BZ)激动剂治疗是否会改变BZ药理学特征的“设定点”。这是通过在特征明确的哺乳动物皮层神经元中,研究BZ配体以及氟西泮慢性治疗后的戊巴比妥对γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)介导的[³⁶Cl⁻]内流的调节来实现的。慢性氟西泮治疗(5微摩尔,10天)导致BZ激动剂(地西泮和氟硝西泮)和反向激动剂(甲基-6,7-二甲氧基-4-乙基-β-咔啉-3'-羧酸盐和乙基-β-咔啉-3-羧酸盐)的效力降低,这通过GABA诱导的[³⁶Cl⁻]内流来衡量。慢性氟西泮治疗虽然未改变它们的半数有效浓度/半数抑制浓度值,但降低了最大效应/最大反向效应值。此外,在72小时撤药后,以及神经元同时暴露于BZ受体拮抗剂Ro15-1788(乙基-8-氟-5,6-二氢-5-甲基-6-氧代-4H-咪唑并[1,5α][1,4]-BZ-3-羧酸盐)时,效力降低得到逆转,但GABA受体拮抗剂R 5135(3α-羟基-16-亚氨基-5β-1,7-雄甾烷-11-酮)和印防己毒素(一种通道阻滞剂)则不能使其逆转。慢性氟西泮治疗还导致戊巴比妥与BZ受体位点解偶联,并降低了戊巴比妥增强GABA介导的[³⁶Cl⁻]内流的效力,这些事件在7图2慢性氟西泮治疗对BZ配体诱导的GABA介导的[³⁶Cl⁻]内流的影响。A:慢性氟西泮治疗(5微摩尔,10天)降低了BZ激动剂(地西泮和氟硝西泮)和反向激动剂(甲基-6,7-二甲氧基-4-乙基-β-咔啉-3'-羧酸盐和乙基-β-咔啉-3-羧酸盐)的效力。B:慢性氟西泮治疗未改变BZ激动剂和反向激动剂的半数有效浓度/半数抑制浓度值,但降低了最大效应/最大反向效应值。数据表示为平均值±标准误。*P < 0.05,与对照相比。2小时撤药和同时暴露于Ro15-1788时也会逆转。慢性氟西泮治疗诱导的解偶联和BZ激动剂效力降低,不会被GABAA受体拮抗剂R 5135或通道阻滞剂印防己毒素逆转。(摘要截短于250字)