Schär A, Messerli-Rohrbach V, Schubarth P
Schweiz Med Wochenschr Suppl. 1994;62:18-27.
Only a few studies have investigated in depth the motives behind the choice of conventional or complementary medicine. While some studies document failures or general mistrust of conventional medicine as the main reasons for turning to complementary medicine, others conclude that the decision to try alternative medicine is not necessarily due to disappointment with conventional medicine but rather an endeavour to do everything possible for one's own health. Patients regard complementary medicine indeed as a complement. Longer-lasting consultation and a better doctor-patient relationship are occasionally mentioned as favourable aspects of complementary medicine. Other motives are a critical attitude to modern civilization and the growing symbolic value of health. The choice may be related to the nature of the disease. Depending on the patient population involved, complementary medicine is used for either more difficult or simpler cases. As a general rule it is the chronic problems that are dealt with by complementary medicine. Users of complementary medicine cannot be regarded as a homogeneous group. Nevertheless, one Swiss study concludes that users of complementary medicine tend to be female, with higher education, from the upper middle class and aged between 30 and 50. They have postmaterialistic value priorities, holistic interpretative models of health and disease, and want to share in decision-making on treatment questions. Approaches and contexts of individual studies differ and the study populations of individual investigations are sometimes questionable. This means that some results are to be treated with caution. The literature under review rarely refers to cultural and social aspects as possible factors, and processes are likewise rarely investigated. Only one study presents behaviour in sickness as a social process which reveals how people perceive, interpret and respond to health problems. In conclusion, the sociological theories and findings involved in the entire question area are briefly outlined.
只有少数研究深入调查了选择传统医学或补充医学背后的动机。虽然一些研究记录了对传统医学的失败或普遍不信任是转向补充医学的主要原因,但其他研究得出结论,尝试替代医学的决定不一定是因为对传统医学失望,而是为自身健康尽一切可能的努力。患者确实将补充医学视为一种补充。较长的咨询时间和更好的医患关系偶尔被提及为补充医学的有利方面。其他动机包括对现代文明的批判态度以及健康日益增长的象征价值。这种选择可能与疾病的性质有关。根据所涉及的患者群体,补充医学用于更困难或更简单的病例。一般来说,补充医学处理的是慢性问题。补充医学的使用者不能被视为一个同质化的群体。尽管如此,一项瑞士研究得出结论,补充医学的使用者往往是女性,受过高等教育,来自中上层阶级,年龄在30至50岁之间。他们有后物质主义的价值优先事项、健康和疾病的整体解释模型,并且希望参与治疗问题的决策。个别研究的方法和背景不同,个别调查的研究人群有时也存在问题。这意味着一些结果需要谨慎对待。所审查的文献很少将文化和社会方面视为可能的因素,相关过程也很少被研究。只有一项研究将患病行为视为一个社会过程,揭示了人们如何感知、解释和应对健康问题。总之,简要概述了整个问题领域所涉及的社会学理论和研究结果。