Thompson R
Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Med Clin North Am. 1994 Sep;78(5):1185-98. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30126-2.
Prevention of nosocomial pneumonia becomes an achievable goal only to the extent that the mechanisms of infection are known. It is likely that there is variation among microorganisms, patients, type of care and intensive care, and practices that determines the relative efficacy of preventive measures. Certain procedures appear to be universally required and include adequate reprocessing of ventilation equipment and infection control measures in patient care. In contrast, many factors may affect the role of the stomach as a cause of nosocomial pneumonia, including enteral feeding procedures and gastric acidity. Differences in results between studies of preventive measures may reflect uncontrolled practice factors, which make the measures either more or less important. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract is a measure with potentially serious consequences, primarily cost and microbial resistance, and should be undertaken with care probably in selected high-risk patients. Other recommendations such as the use of sucralfate, which is effective in prevention of bleeding without clear side effects, are probably worth instituting based on existing evidence. The primary need may be for better reprocessing of equipment or hand washing and sterile gloves, or it may be several changes at once. Certainly an array of preventive measures is necessary, and there is probably no single procedure likely to solve such a complex problem. Use of the collective findings of many investigators needs to be made and strategies applied to each patient and setting. There has been a marked increase in our knowledge of nosocomial pneumonia, and effective measures for prevention are available. Application of these measures widely should reduce the frequency of respiratory complications. The microbiologic tools to compare bacterial isolates have been developed, and the course of events preceding infection of the patient can be demonstrated. The role of equipment, environment, other patients, personnel, colonization sites, and other factors can now be examined. Future studies should control for the many known factors that may predispose to nosocomial pneumonia to make the results meaningful. This would include definition of infection, patient risk factors, identification of microorganisms, details of enteral nutrition, type of stress ulcer prophylaxis, exposure to antimicrobial agents, and institutional resistance patterns. In some studies, surveillance cultures and molecular epidemiology techniques would be required. Large controlled multicenter studies are necessary to determine the significance of the results of promising smaller studies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
只有在了解感染机制的情况下,预防医院获得性肺炎才成为一个可实现的目标。微生物、患者、护理类型和重症监护以及相关做法之间可能存在差异,这些差异决定了预防措施的相对效果。某些程序似乎是普遍需要的,包括对通风设备进行充分的再处理以及在患者护理中采取感染控制措施。相比之下,许多因素可能会影响胃作为医院获得性肺炎病因的作用,包括肠内喂养程序和胃酸度。预防措施研究结果的差异可能反映了未得到控制的实践因素,这些因素使得这些措施的重要性或多或少有所不同。消化道选择性去污是一项可能会产生严重后果的措施,主要是成本和微生物耐药性问题,可能应该谨慎地应用于选定的高危患者。其他建议,如使用硫糖铝,它在预防出血方面有效且无明显副作用,基于现有证据可能值得采用。首要需求可能是更好地对设备进行再处理或加强洗手和使用无菌手套,或者可能需要同时进行多项改变。当然,一系列预防措施是必要的,可能没有单一的程序能够解决如此复杂的问题。需要运用许多研究人员的集体研究结果,并针对每个患者和具体情况应用相应策略。我们对医院获得性肺炎的认识有了显著提高,并且有有效的预防措施。广泛应用这些措施应该会降低呼吸道并发症的发生率。已经开发出了比较细菌分离株的微生物学工具,并且可以证明患者感染之前的一系列事件。现在可以研究设备、环境、其他患者、人员、定植部位以及其他因素的作用。未来的研究应该控制许多可能导致医院获得性肺炎的已知因素,以使结果有意义。这将包括感染的定义、患者风险因素、微生物鉴定、肠内营养细节、应激性溃疡预防类型、抗菌药物暴露情况以及机构耐药模式。在一些研究中,需要进行监测培养和分子流行病学技术研究。有必要开展大规模的对照多中心研究,以确定有前景的小型研究结果的重要性。(摘要截取自400字)