Yang S G, Ahmad S, Wong N C, Hollenberg M D
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Calgary, Faculty of Medicine, Alberta, Canada.
Mol Pharmacol. 1994 Aug;46(2):256-65.
In parallel, we measured the receptor binding affinities for epidermal growth factor-urogastrone (EGF-URO) and transforming growth factor-alpha (TGF-alpha) in cultured smooth muscle (GCM) and epithelial (GPC) cells derived from guinea pig intestine. The relative order of binding affinities in the GCM cells was TGF-alpha > EGF-URO, in keeping with the relative order of biological potencies of these polypeptides in a guinea pig gastric circular muscle contractile bioassay. These data established by ligand binding criteria the presence of a TGF-alpha-preferring receptor in the guinea pig. In contrast, there was a reversed order of binding affinities (EGF-URO > TGF-alpha) for the polypeptides in GPC cells, in accord with an identical order of bioassay potencies previously observed in a guinea pig gastric longitudinal muscle contractile bioassay. Using a reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction approach, we also cloned and sequenced putative EGF-URO receptor ligand binding domain III from each cell type. Although the binding specificity for TGF-alpha and EGF-URO differed in the GCM and GPC cells, the amino acid sequences of receptor domain III were identical in the two cell types. We conclude that the previously measured differences in biological potencies of EGF-URO and TGF-alpha in the contractile bioassay preparations are due to the distinct receptor binding affinities of EGF-URO and TGF-alpha that can be detected in different tissues. However, our data document that the distinct relative binding affinities for EGF-URO and TGF-alpha that can be observed in different cell types from the same species cannot be accounted for solely by the sequence of putative receptor ligand binding domain III.
同时,我们测量了源自豚鼠肠道的培养平滑肌(GCM)细胞和上皮(GPC)细胞中表皮生长因子-尿抑胃素(EGF-URO)和转化生长因子-α(TGF-α)的受体结合亲和力。GCM细胞中结合亲和力的相对顺序为TGF-α > EGF-URO,这与这些多肽在豚鼠胃环形肌收缩生物测定中的生物学活性相对顺序一致。这些数据通过配体结合标准确定了豚鼠中存在一种优先结合TGF-α的受体。相反,GPC细胞中这些多肽的结合亲和力顺序相反(EGF-URO > TGF-α),这与先前在豚鼠胃纵肌收缩生物测定中观察到的相同生物测定活性顺序一致。我们还使用逆转录-聚合酶链反应方法从每种细胞类型中克隆并测序了推定的EGF-URO受体配体结合结构域III。尽管TGF-α和EGF-URO在GCM和GPC细胞中的结合特异性不同,但两种细胞类型中受体结构域III的氨基酸序列是相同的。我们得出结论,先前在收缩生物测定制剂中测量到的EGF-URO和TGF-α生物学活性差异是由于在不同组织中可检测到的EGF-URO和TGF-α独特的受体结合亲和力。然而,我们的数据表明,在同一物种的不同细胞类型中观察到的EGF-URO和TGF-α独特的相对结合亲和力不能仅由推定的受体配体结合结构域III的序列来解释。