Reddy C C, Wells A, Lauffenburger D A
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA.
J Cell Physiol. 1996 Mar;166(3):512-22. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199603)166:3<512::AID-JCP6>3.0.CO;2-S.
Epidermal growth factor (EGF) and transforming growth factor alpha (TGF alpha) elicit quantitatively different cell proliferation responses even though they act via a common receptor, the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We hypothesized that differential cellular trafficking of available ligand is responsible for the different mitogenic responses elicited by EGF and TGF alpha. Mitogenesis and ligand depletion were determined simultaneously in NR6 mouse fibroblasts expressing either wild-type (WT) or internalization-deficient cytoplasmic domain-truncated (c'973) EGFR. Thus we could determine the effects of both ligand-induced and low level constitutive ligand/receptor processing. For a given initial amount of growth factor, TGF alpha is a weaker stimulus than EGF in cells expressing either form of the EGFR. This difference in the mitogenic potencies correlates with increased depletion of TGF alpha observed during the growth assays. When this difference in ligand depletion is accounted for, or minimized, EGF and TGF alpha elicit quantitatively similar growth responses. Therefore, the relative mitogenic potencies of EGF and TGF alpha depend on ligand availability, as determined by the cellular trafficking of these ligands in conjunction with environmental circumstances. Interestingly, our data demonstrate that TGF alpha can be a less potent mitogenic stimulus than EGF under conditions where ligand availability is limited. Further, in our assays, differences in ligand processing are sufficient to explain the different mitogenic potencies of these growth factors in either of the receptor trafficking scenarios. Our results suggest a model of regulation of hormone responsiveness which favors dissociative ligands (such as TGF alpha) in receptor-limited situations and non-dissociative ligands (such as EGF) in the face of high receptor levels.
表皮生长因子(EGF)和转化生长因子α(TGFα)尽管通过共同受体表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)发挥作用,但引发的细胞增殖反应在数量上有所不同。我们推测,可用配体的不同细胞内运输导致了EGF和TGFα引发的不同促有丝分裂反应。在表达野生型(WT)或内化缺陷型胞质结构域截短型(c'973)EGFR的NR6小鼠成纤维细胞中,同时测定促有丝分裂作用和配体消耗。因此,我们可以确定配体诱导的以及低水平组成型配体/受体加工的影响。对于给定初始量的生长因子,在表达任何一种形式EGFR的细胞中,TGFα都是比EGF更弱的刺激。这种促有丝分裂能力的差异与生长测定过程中观察到的TGFα消耗增加相关。当这种配体消耗的差异得到解释或减至最小时,EGF和TGFα引发的生长反应在数量上相似。因此,EGF和TGFα的相对促有丝分裂能力取决于配体的可用性,这由这些配体在细胞内的运输以及环境情况所决定。有趣的是,我们的数据表明,在配体可用性有限的条件下,TGFα作为促有丝分裂刺激物的效力可能比EGF弱。此外,在我们的测定中,配体加工的差异足以解释在任何一种受体运输情况下这些生长因子不同的促有丝分裂能力。我们的结果提出了一种激素反应调节模型,该模型在受体受限的情况下有利于解离性配体(如TGFα),而在受体水平较高时有利于非解离性配体(如EGF)。