Lussi A R, Hotz P
Klinik für Zahnerhaltung, Präventiv- und Kinderzahnmedizin, Universität Bern.
Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed. 1994;104(7):854-8.
It has been shown that the polymerization of certain composite filling materials are inhibited by eugenol containing temporary filling materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different lining materials (Ketac-Bond, Vitrebond, Dropsin, Dycal, Alkaliner, Super EBA [= control]) on the degree of polymerization of different composites (Brilliant Lux, Brilliant, Herculite, Dual-Cement). The degree of polymerization was characterized by Knoop hardness measurements. The data were analysed by the Wilcoxon test. All lining materials decreased the hardness of the adjacent zone of the tested composites. Brilliant Lux showed a significant decrease (p < 0.01) in hardness until a distance of 200 microns from all lining materials. The chemical curing composite (Brilliant) was generally less influenced in its polymerization by the tested lining materials. Light-activated glass ionomer materials influenced the polymerization at least. It was concluded that light-activated composites seemed to be more influenced in their polymerization by adjacent lining materials than chemically activated ones.
已经表明,某些复合填充材料的聚合会受到含丁香酚的临时填充材料的抑制。本研究的目的是评估不同衬层材料(Ketac-Bond、Vitrebond、Dropsin、Dycal、Alkaliner、Super EBA[=对照])对不同复合材料(Brilliant Lux、Brilliant、Herculite、Dual-Cement)聚合程度的影响。聚合程度通过努氏硬度测量来表征。数据通过威尔科克森检验进行分析。所有衬层材料均降低了测试复合材料相邻区域的硬度。Brilliant Lux在距所有衬层材料200微米的距离内,硬度均显著降低(p<0.01)。化学固化复合材料(Brilliant)的聚合一般受测试衬层材料的影响较小。光固化玻璃离子材料对聚合的影响最小。得出的结论是,与化学活化的复合材料相比,光活化复合材料的聚合似乎更容易受到相邻衬层材料的影响。