Cumming M J, Morrow I M
Department of Radiology, Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994 Sep;163(3):517-23. doi: 10.2214/ajr.163.3.8079836.
The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare CT angiography with conventional angiography for detecting stenosis at the carotid bifurcation.
Thirty-five patients referred for evaluation of carotid artery disease were studied with conventional angiography followed by CT angiography 4-24 hr later. Seventy carotid arteries were studied. CT angiograms were acquired by using 40-sec spiral scans with a 2-mm/sec table speed, 2-mm beam collimation, and IV iodinated contrast material injected at 2.5 ml/sec. Studies were interpreted on the CT workstation by using three-dimensional shaded surface objects and multiplanar reformations requiring 10-15 min per artery. The conventional and CT angiograms were interpreted by separate observers who did not know the results of the other imaging study. The degree of stenosis was determined by using the guidelines of the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial collaborators. Each artery was categorized as normal, mildly stenosed (1-29%), moderately stenosed (30-69%), severely stenosed (70-99%), or occluded.
The degree of carotid artery stenosis on the CT angiograms correlated well with that seen on the conventional angiograms (r = .928, p < .001). With CT angiography, all occluded internal carotid arteries were correctly identified, and no arteries were wrongly classified as occluded. The degree of stenosis was overestimated on CT angiograms by greater than 10% in 16 arteries, especially when calcified atherosclerotic plaque was present. In some of these cases, the severity of the stenosis was underestimated on the conventional angiograms. All arteries, except one, with severe disease seen on conventional angiograms were correctly classified on the basis of the results of CT angiography.
Results of CT angiography had a high degree of correlation with results of conventional angiography in the evaluation of carotid artery stenosis. CT angiography is multiplanar and allows differentiation of calcified plaque from contrast material, which provides information about plaque calcification, ulceration, and size that cannot be obtained with conventional angiography.
本研究的目的是前瞻性地比较CT血管造影与传统血管造影在检测颈动脉分叉处狭窄方面的效果。
对35例因颈动脉疾病前来评估的患者先进行传统血管造影,随后在4 - 24小时后进行CT血管造影。共研究了70条颈动脉。CT血管造影采用40秒螺旋扫描,扫描床速度为2毫米/秒,束准直为2毫米,并以2.5毫升/秒的速度静脉注射碘造影剂。在CT工作站上使用三维表面阴影显示和多平面重建技术对图像进行解读,每条动脉解读需要10 - 15分钟。传统血管造影和CT血管造影由互不了解对方成像研究结果的独立观察者解读。狭窄程度根据北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验协作组的指南确定。每条动脉分为正常、轻度狭窄(1 - 29%)、中度狭窄(30 - 69%)、重度狭窄(70 - 99%)或闭塞。
CT血管造影显示的颈动脉狭窄程度与传统血管造影所见高度相关(r = 0.928,p < 0.001)。通过CT血管造影,所有闭塞的颈内动脉均被正确识别,且无动脉被错误分类为闭塞。在16条动脉中,CT血管造影对狭窄程度的高估超过10%,尤其是存在钙化动脉粥样硬化斑块时。在其中一些病例中,传统血管造影对狭窄严重程度的评估偏低。除一条动脉外,所有在传统血管造影中显示严重病变的动脉根据CT血管造影结果均被正确分类。
在评估颈动脉狭窄方面,CT血管造影结果与传统血管造影结果高度相关。CT血管造影具有多平面成像能力,能够区分钙化斑块与造影剂,提供传统血管造影无法获得的有关斑块钙化、溃疡和大小的信息。