Kinetics of cell proliferation and cell loss in the peripheral and central parts of Walker tumours growing in rats and nude mice.

In previous experiments it was shown that, in the submucosal part of Walker tumours transplanted to the gastric wall of rats, a lower rate of cell proliferation was seen in the peripheral zone, defined as the outer 100-120 mu of the tumours, than in the main tumour mass. The purpose of the present experiments was to investigate whether such differences are independent of the location of the Walker tumour, or were caused by local factors specific for the gastric mucosa, and whether specific cellular immunity cell proliferation at the periphery of a transplanted tumour. Cells from Walker 256 tumour were injected into the subcutaneous space in rats and in mutant nude mice, which lack T lymphocytes. In one series, the rats and mice were injected with 3H-TDR at different time intervals before sacrifice. In a second series vinblastine sulfate was injected 3 hours before sacrifice. Although all the animals were given the same tumour dose, the tumours in mice increased in size more slowly than those in rats. In the first-mentioned series, the mitotic counts, the labelled cells and the percentage labelled mitoses (PLM) in the main tumour mass and at the tumour perphery were counted. In the second series the mitotic rate in the same two regions was determined. A significantly lower rate of cell proliferation was demonstrated at the periphery compared to the main tumour mass in both rats and mice. Differences between the PLM curves in the two regions were also found. Possible explanations of these findings are discussed. It is concluded that the described growth pattern is probably a general characteristic of the Walker tumour, and that the low rate of proliferation at the periphery is not caused by specific immunological mechanisms mediated through T lymphocytes. If the growth rates were calculated on the assumtion that the actual tumour growth followed a Gompertz function, then the rate of cell loss in the tumour in mice was higher than that in the tumour in rats.