• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Initial rates of degradation of protein fractions from fresh, wilted, and ensiled alfalfa.

作者信息

Makoni N F, Shelford J A, Fisher L J

机构信息

US Dairy Forage Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706.

出版信息

J Dairy Sci. 1994 Jun;77(6):1598-603. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77102-2.

DOI:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77102-2
PMID:8083420
Abstract

Initial rates of in vitro degradation of alfalfa proteins were studied. Fresh, 24-h wilted, and ensiled forages were homogenized before analysis for total proteins. Some of the homogenates were fractionated by differential solubility in 10 and 40% ammonium sulfate, followed by ultrafiltration of the 40% salt-saturated solution. The protein fractions obtained were chloroplast membrane proteins (fraction 3), soluble proteins from plant cell cytoplasm and the chloroplast (fraction 2), and proteins remaining soluble in the extracted 40% salt-saturated solution (fraction 2B), respectively. Total and fraction 3 silage proteins were degraded faster than the respective fresh and wilted proteins. There were no treatment effects on the rates of degradation of the soluble proteins of fractions 2 and 2B. Protein fractions from fresh and 24-h wilted alfalfa degraded, from greatest to least, in the following order: fractions 2, 2B, and 3. Degradation rates for fractions 2 and 2B of ensiled forages were similar but greater than that of fraction 3. Alfalfa proteins were degraded rapidly in the rumen, and soluble proteins were degraded faster than the chloroplast membrane proteins. Ensiling of alfalfa increased the rate of degradation of chloroplast membrane proteins, but neither wilting nor ensiling affected degradation rates of the soluble protein fractions 2 and 2B.

摘要

相似文献

1
Initial rates of degradation of protein fractions from fresh, wilted, and ensiled alfalfa.
J Dairy Sci. 1994 Jun;77(6):1598-603. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)77102-2.
2
In vitro ruminal degradation and synthesis of protein on fractions extracted from alfalfa hay and silage.苜蓿干草和青贮饲料提取物中蛋白质的体外瘤胃降解与合成
J Dairy Sci. 1996 Apr;79(4):612-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76406-8.
3
Effect of plant maturity and preservation method on in vitro protein degradation of forages.植物成熟度和保存方法对草料体外蛋白质降解的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 1995 Jul;78(7):1544-51. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76776-5.
4
Effect of chestnut tannin on fermentation quality, proteolysis, and protein rumen degradability of alfalfa silage.板栗单宁对苜蓿青贮饲料发酵品质、蛋白水解及蛋白质瘤胃降解率的影响
J Dairy Sci. 2006 Dec;89(12):4736-46. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72523-1.
5
Prediction of protein degradation of forages from solubility fractions.
J Dairy Sci. 1995 Aug;78(8):1774-88. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(95)76803-5.
6
Changes in total and individual proteins during drying, ensiling, and ruminal fermentation of forages.
J Dairy Sci. 1994 Feb;77(2):492-500. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(94)76977-0.
7
Inoculant effects on alfalfa silage: in vitro gas and volatile fatty acid production.接种剂对苜蓿青贮饲料的影响:体外产气及挥发性脂肪酸生成
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Nov;90(11):5115-25. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-878.
8
Short communication: effect of tannic acid on composition and ruminal degradability of bermudagrass and alfalfa silages.简短通讯:单宁酸对百慕大草和苜蓿青贮饲料组成及瘤胃降解率的影响
J Dairy Sci. 2000 Sep;83(9):2016-20. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)75080-6.
9
Sources of variation in rates of in vitro ruminal protein degradation.体外瘤胃蛋白质降解率的变异来源。
J Dairy Sci. 2004 May;87(5):1345-59. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73284-1.
10
The development of lactic acid bacteria and Lactobacillus buchneri and their effects on the fermentation of alfalfa silage.乳酸菌和布氏乳杆菌的发展及其对苜蓿青贮发酵的影响。
J Dairy Sci. 2009 Oct;92(10):5005-10. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1701.