Johnson T P, Ford L, Warnecke R B, Nayfield S G, Kaluzny A, Cutter G, Gillings D, Sondik E, Ozer H
Survey Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Chicago 60607.
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Sep;12(9):1783-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.9.1783.
This study evaluates the effect of the 1988 National Cancer Institute Clinical Alert regarding treatment of early-stage breast cancer on the patterns of treatment provided to patients.
Data analyzed were collected from the hospital and outpatient records of 12,534 female patients with a primary diagnosis of breast cancer (stages I and II) initially diagnosed during the years 1983 through 1989.
Analyses revealed that the proportions of patients with a negative lymph node status diagnosed after the May 1988 Clinical Alert who received adjuvant treatment (tamoxifen and/or multidrug chemotherapy) were significantly greater than predicted from treatment trends established before the Alert's release. Proportions of patients with positive lymph node status receiving adjuvant therapy subsequent to the Alert's release, in contrast, did not fall outside the projected confidence intervals for that group. Additional analyses showed a significant effect of the Clinical Alert among several subgroups of node-negative patients.
Findings suggest that the Clinical Alert mechanism, followed by publication in the peer-reviewed scientific literature, is an effective way to communicate important research findings to practitioners in the community. However, the Alert mechanism is controversial and should be used judiciously to ensure its credibility.
本研究评估了1988年美国国立癌症研究所关于早期乳腺癌治疗的临床警报对患者治疗模式的影响。
分析的数据收集自1983年至1989年期间初诊为原发性乳腺癌(I期和II期)的12534名女性患者的医院和门诊记录。
分析显示,1988年5月临床警报发布后确诊的淋巴结阴性患者接受辅助治疗(他莫昔芬和/或多药化疗)的比例显著高于警报发布前确立的治疗趋势所预测的比例。相比之下,警报发布后接受辅助治疗的淋巴结阳性患者比例并未超出该组预测的置信区间。进一步分析表明,临床警报对淋巴结阴性患者的几个亚组有显著影响。
研究结果表明,临床警报机制随后在同行评审的科学文献中发表,是向社区从业者传达重要研究结果的有效方式。然而,警报机制存在争议,应谨慎使用以确保其可信度。