Land V J, Shuster J J, Crist W M, Ravindranath Y, Harris M B, Krance R A, Pinkel D, Pullen D J
St Louis Children's Hospital, Washington University Medical Center, MO.
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Sep;12(9):1939-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.9.1939.
To compare efficacy and toxicity of two schedules of intermediate-dose methotrexate (IDM) and cytarabine (Ara-C) in remission consolidation of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
In 1986, the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) began a randomized trial to test two schedules of consolidation chemotherapy in children with newly diagnosed B-precursor cell ALL. MTX and Ara-C were given as overlapping 24-hour infusions. The dose and sequence of MTX and Ara-C administration were based on a preclinical model that had demonstrated synergism between these two agents. Two hundred fifteen patients in complete remission were randomized to front-loading consolidation therapy in which six MTX/Ara-C infusions were administered at 3-week intervals from the 7th through the 19th week of therapy. Two hundred thirteen patients in complete remission were randomized to receive standard consolidation therapy in which the six MTX/Ara-C infusions were given every 12 weeks from the 7th through the 67th week of therapy.
Both regimens produced similar rates of adverse side effects, except for a higher incidence of CNS toxicity in individuals randomized to the front-loading arm (32 of 215 v 12 of 213 patients, P = .002). Leukoencephalopathy occurred in three patients on the front-loading regimen and was permanent in one. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the probability of continuing in complete remission for 5 years was 79% (SE = 5%) and 85% (SE = 5%) for good-risk patients, and 66% (SE = 6%) and 61% (SE = 7%) for poor-risk patients randomized to front-loading and standard regimens, respectively.
Although differences in complete remission durations were not statistically significant by log-rank analysis (P = .62 for good-risk patients, .89 for poor-risk patients, and .99 overall), the results are comparable to those in previous studies using more toxic agents as components of remission consolidation therapy.
比较两种中剂量甲氨蝶呤(IDM)和阿糖胞苷(Ara-C)方案在儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)缓解巩固治疗中的疗效和毒性。
1986年,儿科肿瘤学组(POG)开始一项随机试验,以测试新诊断的B前体细胞ALL患儿的两种巩固化疗方案。甲氨蝶呤(MTX)和阿糖胞苷(Ara-C)通过24小时重叠输注给药。MTX和Ara-C给药的剂量和顺序基于一个临床前模型,该模型已证明这两种药物之间具有协同作用。215例完全缓解的患者被随机分配接受前负荷巩固治疗,即在治疗的第7周至第19周每隔3周进行6次MTX/Ara-C输注。213例完全缓解的患者被随机分配接受标准巩固治疗,即在治疗的第7周至第67周每隔12周进行6次MTX/Ara-C输注。
两种方案产生的不良反应发生率相似,但随机分配到前负荷组的个体中枢神经系统毒性发生率较高(215例中有32例,213例中有12例,P = 0.002)。3例接受前负荷方案的患者发生了白质脑病,其中1例为永久性。通过Kaplan-Meier分析,低危患者随机接受前负荷和标准方案继续完全缓解5年的概率分别为79%(SE = 5%)和85%(SE = 5%),高危患者分别为66%(SE = 6%)和61%(SE = 7%)。
尽管通过对数秩分析完全缓解持续时间的差异无统计学意义(低危患者P = 0.62,高危患者P = 0.89,总体P = 0.99),但结果与之前使用毒性更强的药物作为缓解巩固治疗组成部分的研究结果相当。