Rosenthal D, Dickson C, Rodriguez F J, Blackshear W M, Clark M D, Lamis P A, Pallos L L
Georgia Baptist Medical Center, Medical College of Georgia, Atlanta.
J Vasc Surg. 1994 Sep;20(3):389-94; discussion 394-5. doi: 10.1016/0741-5214(94)90137-6.
With 70 cm "cutter" valvulotomes for valvulotomy and an electronically steerable nitinol catheter to occlude venous tributaries with platinum coils, endovascular in situ saphenous vein (EISV) bypass can be safely performed from within the saphenous vein. To determine whether EISV bypass could reduce hospital length of stay (LOS) and perioperative morbidity without compromising patency, another 53 EISV bypasses for limb salvage were performed.
Tributary occlusion was accomplished with only fluoroscopic surveillance with a new, smaller, and more steerable silicone-tipped nitinol catheter.
Two (3.7%) wound complications occurred. The mean hospital LOS after operation was 4.2 days (range 2 to 29 days). All tributaries initially embolized remained occluded, and three "missed" arteriovenous fistulas were identified during follow-up extending to 15 month (mean 8.4 months). Eighty-eight percent (49 of 54) of phase II bypasses remained patent, whereas life-table analysis of all bypasses (phase I and II) was 77% (69/99) at 24 months follow-up (mean 13.6 months). By comparison, 41 infrainguinal saphenous vein in situ bypasses with "classic" open techniques were performed concurrently. The mean postoperative LOS was 11.6 days (range 4 to 42 days), wound complications occurred in 24% (10) of patients, and two "missed" arteriovenous fistulas were identified during follow-up. Eighty-three percent (34 of 41) of bypasses remain patent at 24 months follow-up (mean 16.2 months).
If EISV bypass long-term patency rates remain similar to classic in situ bypass patency results, the additional benefits of decreased hospital LOS, reduced wound-related complications, shortened recuperation, and therefore increased health care savings gives this endovascular technique strong consideration as the possible future operation for infrainguinal saphenous veins in situ bypass.
使用70厘米的“切割器”瓣膜刀进行瓣膜切开术,并使用电子可控的镍钛诺导管用铂金线圈闭塞静脉分支,可在大隐静脉内安全地进行血管腔内原位大隐静脉(EISV)旁路移植术。为了确定EISV旁路移植术能否在不影响通畅率的情况下缩短住院时间(LOS)并降低围手术期发病率,又进行了53例用于肢体挽救的EISV旁路移植术。
仅通过荧光镜监测,使用一种新型、更小且更易操控的带硅胶头镍钛诺导管完成分支闭塞。
发生了2例(3.7%)伤口并发症。术后平均住院时间为4.2天(范围2至29天)。所有最初栓塞的分支均保持闭塞状态,在长达15个月(平均8.4个月)的随访期间发现了3例“遗漏”的动静脉瘘。二期旁路移植术的88%(54例中的49例)保持通畅,而所有旁路移植术(一期和二期)在24个月随访(平均13.6个月)时的生存表分析通畅率为77%(99例中的69例)。相比之下,同期采用“经典”开放技术进行了41例腹股沟下原位大隐静脉旁路移植术。术后平均住院时间为11.6天(范围4至42天),24%(10例)的患者发生伤口并发症,随访期间发现2例“遗漏”的动静脉瘘。在24个月随访(平均16.2个月)时,83%(41例中的34例)的旁路移植术保持通畅。
如果EISV旁路移植术的长期通畅率与经典原位旁路移植术的通畅结果相似,那么住院时间缩短、伤口相关并发症减少、恢复时间缩短以及由此带来的医疗保健费用节省等额外益处,使得这种血管腔内技术有充分理由被视为未来腹股沟下原位大隐静脉旁路移植术的可能术式。