Clarke R W, Gray C
Centre for Health Service Management, University of Nottingham.
BMJ. 1994;309(6953):528-30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6953.528.
The lead negotiators for the management and consultant sides in an NHS trust in northern England responded to debate in their trust about consultant contracts by offering to research the attitudes of their peers towards a variety of contract options. The options tested included the current contract; models already examined in the trust and elsewhere, such as time sensitive and mild performance related contracts; and some more radical and speculative possibilities, including consultants franchising their services to the trust. Beyond the predictable conclusion that consultants would prefer no change while managers desired it, a time sensitive contract emerged as having potential for successful negotiation. On the other hand, neither consultants nor managers favoured a strict performance related contract or a fee for service contract. There was a strong similarity of opinion between the two groups on the relative salary values of the options, though the consultants consistently priced these higher than the managers.
英格兰北部一家国民健康服务信托机构中,管理层和顾问方的首席谈判代表针对信托机构内关于顾问合同的辩论做出回应,提议研究同行对多种合同选项的态度。所测试的选项包括现行合同;该信托机构及其他地方已经研究过的模式,如限时合同和轻度绩效相关合同;以及一些更激进、更具推测性的可能性,包括顾问将其服务授权给该信托机构。除了顾问们希望维持现状而管理层希望改变这一可预见的结论外,限时合同显现出成功谈判的潜力。另一方面,顾问和管理层都不青睐严格的绩效相关合同或服务收费合同。两组人员在各选项相对薪资价值方面意见高度一致,不过顾问们对这些选项的定价始终高于管理层。