Promoting research into peer review. Referees should provide references.
作者信息
Furness P
出版信息
BMJ. 1994;309(6953):539.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Promoting research into peer review. Referees should provide references.促进同行评审研究。审稿人应提供参考文献。
BMJ. 1994;309(6953):539.
2
A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.对作者或期刊编辑在同行评审过程中所选审稿人报告的比较。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Apr;82(4 Suppl):133-5.
3
Malicious referees.恶意评审人。
Nature. 1997 Mar 27;386(6623):319. doi: 10.1038/386319d0.
4
Peer reviews: in praise of referees.同行评议：赞裁判
Nature. 2011 May 26;473(7348):452. doi: 10.1038/473452a.
5
Discourse among referees and editors would help.审稿人和编辑之间的交流将会有所帮助。
Nature. 2006 Feb 16;439(7078):784. doi: 10.1038/439784d.
6
Promoting research into peer review. Identify referees' institutions.促进同行评审研究。确定审稿人的机构。
BMJ. 1994;309(6953):538-9.
7
[Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].科学手稿的同行评审应该公开，并且应该考虑评审人员的偏见。
Lakartidningen. 2004 Oct 28;101(44):3458.
8
Setting the record straight.澄清事实。
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jan;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/nn0107-1.
9
[From the Cochrane Library: the use of peer review is still under discussion].[源自考克兰图书馆：同行评审的使用仍在讨论中]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2008 Apr 19;152(16):934-7.
10
Pre-peer review, peer review, and post-peer review: three areas with potential for improvement.同行评审前、同行评审和同行评审后：三个有待改进的方面。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):309-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.013. Epub 2008 Jan 14.
本文引用的文献
1
Personal computer software for handling references from CD-ROM and mainframe sources for scientific and medical reports.用于处理来自光盘和大型机源的科学与医学报告参考文献的个人计算机软件。
BMJ. 1993 Jul 17;307(6897):180-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6897.180.
2
Promoting research into peer review.推动同行评审研究。
BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):143-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.143.
Zotero 插件