Promoting research into peer review. Identify referees' institutions.
作者信息
Poller D N
出版信息
BMJ. 1994;309(6953):538-9.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Promoting research into peer review. Identify referees' institutions.促进同行评审研究。确定审稿人的机构。
BMJ. 1994;309(6953):538-9.
2
How to reply to referees' comments when submitting manuscripts for publication.投稿发表时如何回复审稿人的意见。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Jul;51(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.01.049.
3
[Peer review of scientific manuscripts should be open and referees' bias should be accounted for].科学手稿的同行评审应该公开，并且应该考虑评审人员的偏见。
Lakartidningen. 2004 Oct 28;101(44):3458.
4
[Peer review in requests for subsidy].[补贴申请中的同行评审]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1997 Mar 29;141(13):643-4.
5
A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.对作者或期刊编辑在同行评审过程中所选审稿人报告的比较。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Apr;82(4 Suppl):133-5.
6
[Electronic manuscripts: the periodicals earn money, the referees pay].
Lakartidningen. 2005;102(11):888.
7
Promoting research into peer review. Referees should provide references.促进同行评审研究。审稿人应提供参考文献。
BMJ. 1994;309(6953):539.
8
[Lessons learned from the coxibs' ups and downs. The journals must be tougher against referees and authors].[从昔布类药物的起伏中吸取的教训。期刊必须对审稿人和作者更加严格]
Lakartidningen. 2008;105(21):1560-1.
9
Setting the record straight.澄清事实。
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jan;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/nn0107-1.
10
Authorship and accountability: the interface between research institutions and journals.作者身份与责任：研究机构和期刊之间的接口
Ethiop Med J. 2003 Apr;41(2):109.
本文引用的文献
1
Promoting research into peer review.推动同行评审研究。
BMJ. 1994 Jul 16;309(6948):143-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6948.143.
Zotero 插件