Mulrow C D
Division of General Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 70284.
BMJ. 1994 Sep 3;309(6954):597-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597.
Systematic literature reviews including meta-analyses are invaluable scientific activities. The rationale for such reviews is well established. Health care providers, researchers, and policy makers are inundated with unmanageable amounts of information; they need systematic reviews to efficiently integrate existing information and provide data for rational decision making. Systematic reviews establish whether scientific findings are consistent and can be generalised across populations, settings, and treatment variations, or whether findings vary significantly by particular subsets. Meta-analyses in particular can increase power and precision of estimates of treatment effects and exposure risks. Finally, explicit methods used in systematic reviews limit bias and, hopefully, will improve reliability and accuracy of conclusions.
包括荟萃分析在内的系统文献综述是非常有价值的科学活动。进行此类综述的基本原理已得到充分确立。医疗保健提供者、研究人员和政策制定者面临着海量难以处理的信息;他们需要系统综述来有效整合现有信息,并为合理决策提供数据。系统综述能够确定科学研究结果是否一致,能否在不同人群、环境和治疗差异中进行推广,或者研究结果在特定子集中是否存在显著差异。特别是荟萃分析可以提高治疗效果和暴露风险估计的效力和精度。最后,系统综述中使用的明确方法能够限制偏差,并有望提高结论的可靠性和准确性。