Almkvist O
Department of Geriatric Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge Hospital, Sweden.
Dementia. 1994 May-Aug;5(3-4):203-9. doi: 10.1159/000106724.
The hypothesis that vascular dementia (VAD) may be associated with a specific pattern of neuropsychological dysfunction as compared to Alzheimer's disease (AD) is reviewed. The empirical findings were evaluated with regard to methodology, most importantly the comparability between groups regarding demographic variables and severity of dementia. They were also classified according to the cognitive and sensory-motor functions affected. No consistent differences were found between VAD and AD patients in neuropsychological performance testing general cognitive functioning, syntax, verbal comprehension, visuospatial tasks, and primary as well as semantic memory, indicating a functional similarity between VAD and AD. However, inferior performance was found for VAD in executive functioning, verbal fluency, attention, and motor performance. Superior performance for VAD was found in naming and with regard to intrusion errors. The findings on episodic memory were inconclusive. These results should be considered in light of possible selection bias due to the fact that all studies used a hospital-based sample of subjects and not subjects from the community. Bias may also arise from the variations in lesion site, size, number, and timing between different VAD groups. Third, the risk of confounding errors due to a lack of comparability between etiological groups in terms of demographic variables as well as cognitive decline cannot be excluded. Future studies should take into account variation in the severity of cognitive decline, variation regarding lesion characteristics, etiological factors, and subtypes of VAD in order to increase our knowledge about the functional features of VAD.
本文综述了血管性痴呆(VAD)与阿尔茨海默病(AD)相比可能与特定神经心理功能障碍模式相关的假说。从方法学角度对实证研究结果进行了评估,最重要的是各研究组在人口统计学变量和痴呆严重程度方面的可比性。研究结果还根据受影响的认知和感觉运动功能进行了分类。在神经心理性能测试中的一般认知功能、句法、语言理解、视觉空间任务、初级记忆和语义记忆方面,未发现VAD患者和AD患者之间存在一致差异,这表明VAD和AD之间存在功能相似性。然而,发现VAD在执行功能、语言流畅性、注意力和运动表现方面较差。VAD在命名和侵入性错误方面表现较好。情景记忆的研究结果尚无定论。鉴于所有研究均使用基于医院的受试者样本而非社区受试者样本,可能存在选择偏倚,应考虑这些结果。不同VAD组之间病变部位、大小、数量和时间的差异也可能导致偏倚。第三,病因学组在人口统计学变量以及认知衰退方面缺乏可比性,导致混淆错误的风险也不能排除。未来的研究应考虑认知衰退严重程度的差异、病变特征、病因因素以及VAD亚型的差异,以增加我们对VAD功能特征的了解。