Kump K, Whalen C, Tishler P V, Browner I, Ferrette V, Strohl K P, Rosenberg C, Redline S
Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Sep;150(3):735-41. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.150.3.8087345.
Although questionnaires have been developed to assess symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), their overall reliability and utility have not been established. We have evaluated the ability of a questionnaire to identify increased apnea activity (IAA) in 465 participants in an epidemiologic study of OSA. Subjects and their roommates each completed a questionnaire and underwent in-home sleep studies. Responses to 56 questions about sleep habits, sleepiness, and daytime performance were analyzed with factor analysis, logistic regression, and receiver-operator curves (ROCs). Factor analysis demonstrated that 16 questions, grouped into five factors (functional impact of sleepiness, self-reported breathing disturbances, roommate-observed breathing disturbances, driving impairment, and insomnia) explained 67% of the variance in the questionnaire data. Symptom questions demonstrated internal consistency (Cronbach correlations: 0.91 to 0.98). Moderate levels of agreement were observed between self- and roommate-reported responses for nine of ten questions asked of both the subject and his/her partner (kappa statistics: 0.34 to 0.57). Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that IAA could be best predicted by three questions about intensity of snoring, roommate-observed choking, and having fallen asleep while driving (ROC area: 0.78). Use of symptoms with data on gender and body mass index (BMI) improved predictive ability by 10% (ROC area: 0.87). Thus, questionnaire data provide a valid means of characterizing symptom distributions in population surveys of OSA. Predictive ability is not significantly improved with multiple questions or a separate roommate questionnaire, but is improved with consideration of data on BMI and gender.
尽管已经开发出问卷来评估阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)的症状,但其整体可靠性和实用性尚未得到证实。在一项OSA的流行病学研究中,我们评估了一份问卷识别465名参与者中呼吸暂停活动增加(IAA)的能力。受试者及其室友各自完成了一份问卷,并在家中进行了睡眠研究。通过因子分析、逻辑回归和受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)对关于睡眠习惯、嗜睡和日间表现的56个问题的回答进行了分析。因子分析表明,16个问题分为五个因子(嗜睡的功能影响、自我报告的呼吸障碍、室友观察到的呼吸障碍、驾驶障碍和失眠)解释了问卷数据中67%的方差。症状问题显示出内部一致性(克朗巴赫相关性:0.91至0.98)。在受试者及其伴侣被问到的十个问题中,有九个问题的自我报告和室友报告的回答之间观察到中等程度的一致性(kappa统计量:0.34至0.57)。逻辑回归分析表明,关于打鼾强度、室友观察到的窒息以及开车时睡着的三个问题能够最好地预测IAA(ROC面积:0.78)。将症状与性别和体重指数(BMI)数据结合使用可使预测能力提高10%(ROC面积:0.87)。因此,问卷数据为在OSA人群调查中描述症状分布提供了一种有效的方法。多个问题或单独的室友问卷并不能显著提高预测能力,但考虑BMI和性别数据可提高预测能力。