Lieberman D
Gastroenterology Section, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland.
Cancer. 1994 Oct 1;74(7 Suppl):2023-7. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7+<2023::aid-cncr2820741706>3.0.co;2-o.
Colon cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in the United States, causing approximately 60,000 deaths each year. Ideal screening would identify high risk patients and screen them with sensitive tests. Most cancers evolve from adenomatous polyps. There is now evidence that detection and removal of adenomas can prevent cancer. Unfortunately, our ability to identify high risk patients is limited. Screening of asymptomatic, average-risk individuals has been advocated, with the goal of reducing colon cancer mortality by detecting cancers at an early, curable stage or preventing cancer by detecting and removing adenomatous polyps. Recent data have suggested that screening populations older than age 50 with sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood tests can reduce colon cancer mortality. These reports are encouraging but also highlight significant limitations of this form of screening. Screening itself is designed merely to identify something that, once identified, needs further evaluation. Therefore, any discussion of colon screening must include consideration of how physicians will approach positive test results. The strategies for dealing with positive test results are costly and invariably lead to further surveillance. Current data suggest that patients with large polyps (> 1 cm) or villous adenomas have a high risk of colon cancer and are likely to benefit from full colonoscopy and subsequent surveillance. The benefits are far less clear for patients with small polyps. The subject of colon screening becomes even more complicated as consideration is given to when to start and stop screening, and how often to perform screening exams. There is clearly a need to improve upon the ability to identify patients most likely to develop colon cancer and design strategies to prevent cancer in this group. In the future, it may be possible to identify the high risk patient with some precision using genetic or biologic markers.
结肠癌是美国癌症死亡的主要原因之一,每年导致约60000人死亡。理想的筛查应能识别高危患者并用敏感的检测方法对其进行筛查。大多数癌症由腺瘤性息肉演变而来。现在有证据表明,检测并切除腺瘤可以预防癌症。不幸的是,我们识别高危患者的能力有限。有人主张对无症状的平均风险个体进行筛查,目的是通过在癌症早期可治愈阶段检测到癌症或通过检测并切除腺瘤性息肉来预防癌症,从而降低结肠癌死亡率。最近的数据表明,用乙状结肠镜检查和粪便潜血试验对50岁以上人群进行筛查可降低结肠癌死亡率。这些报告令人鼓舞,但也凸显了这种筛查形式的重大局限性。筛查本身仅仅是为了识别出一旦发现就需要进一步评估的情况。因此,任何关于结肠癌筛查的讨论都必须考虑医生将如何处理阳性检测结果。处理阳性检测结果的策略成本高昂,而且总是会导致进一步的监测。目前的数据表明,患有大息肉(>1厘米)或绒毛状腺瘤的患者患结肠癌的风险很高,可能会从全结肠镜检查及后续监测中受益。对于小息肉患者,益处则远不那么明显。随着考虑何时开始和停止筛查以及多久进行一次筛查检查,结肠癌筛查的问题变得更加复杂。显然有必要提高识别最有可能患结肠癌患者的能力,并设计针对该群体预防癌症的策略。未来,有可能利用基因或生物标志物较为精确地识别高危患者。