Fürst G, Sitzer M, Hofer M, Steinmetz H, Hackländer T, Müller E, Mödder U
Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, Heinrich Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994 Sep-Oct;18(5):688-96. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199409000-00003.
The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of a two-dimensional phase-sensitive MR technique [phase mapping (PM)] for the quantification of carotid blood flow velocity (CBFV) and pulsatility in normal subjects and patients with extracranial carotid disease.
Using PM, we measured the systolic peak, minimum diastolic, and mean CBFV and the pulsatility index in both common carotid arteries (CCAs) of 22 normal subjects and 32 patients. In addition, the CBFV was quantified in the internal carotid arteries (ICAs) of 25 patients. These data were compared with independent measurements based on pulsed-wave Doppler ultrasonography.
Correlations between PM and pulsed-wave Doppler were strong for systolic peak CBFV in both the CCA (r = 0.91) and the ICA (r > or = 0.82). Slightly lower correlations were obtained for mean CBFV (r > or = 0.79) and minimum diastolic CBFV (r > or = 0.75), both measured in the CCA. Velocity waveform comparison revealed high between-method correlations for the CCA (r = 0.90 for normals; r > or = 0.88 for patients) and slightly lower correlations for the ICA (r > or = 0.75). Agreement was lower (r = 0.63) for measurements in the ICA distal to high grade stenosis.
Phase mapping compared well with Doppler ultrasonography in quantifying CBFV and pulsatility in patients with extracranial carotid artery disease. Except for poststenotic measurements in high grade obstructive lesions, PM is capable of providing quantitative hemodynamic information on the severity of ICA stenosis.
本研究旨在确定二维相敏磁共振技术[相位映射(PM)]在正常受试者及颅外颈动脉疾病患者中定量颈动脉血流速度(CBFV)和搏动性的可行性。
我们使用PM测量了22名正常受试者和32名患者双侧颈总动脉(CCA)的收缩期峰值、舒张期末最小值和平均CBFV以及搏动指数。此外,还对25名患者的颈内动脉(ICA)进行了CBFV定量。这些数据与基于脉冲波多普勒超声的独立测量结果进行了比较。
PM与脉冲波多普勒在CCA(r = 0.91)和ICA(r≥0.82)的收缩期峰值CBFV方面相关性很强。在CCA测量的平均CBFV(r≥0.79)和舒张期末最小值CBFV(r≥0.75)相关性略低。速度波形比较显示,CCA的方法间相关性较高(正常人为r = 0.90;患者为r≥0.88),而ICA的相关性略低(r≥0.75)。在高度狭窄远端的ICA测量中一致性较低(r = 0.63)。
在颅外颈动脉疾病患者中,相位映射在定量CBFV和搏动性方面与多普勒超声比较良好。除了对高度阻塞性病变狭窄后测量外,PM能够提供关于ICA狭窄严重程度的定量血流动力学信息。