• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗菌洗手液残留活性评估:一项“实际使用”场景研究。

An evaluation of the residual activity of antiseptic handrub lotions: an 'in use' setting study.

作者信息

Namura S, Nishijima S, Asada Y

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

J Dermatol. 1994 Jul;21(7):481-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1994.tb01778.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1346-8138.1994.tb01778.x
PMID:8089367
Abstract

An evaluation of the residual activity of quick-drying agents (alcoholic solutions) used for hygienic hand disinfection is described. We looked for residual efficacy following hand disinfection with soap and water alone or followed by one of two alcoholic handrub lotions supplied from an automatic hand washing machine. The bacterial counts on the hands obtained before and within 2 successive hours after disinfection showed that alcoholic chlorhexidine was the most effective for 10 minutes after contamination of the hands. WELPAS (alcoholic chlorbenzarconium) followed this in its immediate effect and was better than soap and water alone. There were no significant differences after 30' or 120' between the three disinfecting methods.

摘要

本文描述了对用于手部卫生消毒的速干剂(酒精溶液)残留活性的评估。我们研究了仅用肥皂和水洗手后,或先用肥皂和水洗手再使用自动洗手器提供的两种酒精洗手液之一进行手部消毒后的残留效果。消毒前及消毒后连续2小时内手部的细菌计数表明,酒精洗必泰在手部污染后10分钟内效果最佳。WELPAS(酒精性氯苄烷铵)的即时效果次之,且优于仅用肥皂和水洗手。三种消毒方法在30分钟或120分钟后无显著差异。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of the residual activity of antiseptic handrub lotions: an 'in use' setting study.抗菌洗手液残留活性评估:一项“实际使用”场景研究。
J Dermatol. 1994 Jul;21(7):481-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1994.tb01778.x.
2
Soap pH and the effectiveness of alcoholic hand antiseptics.
Scand J Dent Res. 1989 Oct;97(5):451-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1989.tb01460.x.
3
[Comparison of antibacterial effects of different antiseptics after hand washing].[洗手后不同防腐剂抗菌效果的比较]
Mikrobiyol Bul. 2004 Jan-Apr;38(1-2):137-43.
4
A study of the efficacy of antimicrobial detergents for hand washing: using the full-hand touch plates method.抗菌洗涤剂洗手效果的研究:采用全手接触平板法
J Dermatol. 1993 Feb;20(2):88-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1993.tb03837.x.
5
Study of the efficacy of antiseptic handrub lotions with hand washing machines.使用洗手机器的抗菌洗手液功效研究。
J Dermatol. 1994 Jun;21(6):405-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.1994.tb01763.x.
6
Surgical hand disinfection: effect of sequential use of two chlorhexidine preparations.外科手消毒:两种洗必泰制剂序贯使用的效果
J Hosp Infect. 1990 Aug;16(2):161-6. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(90)90060-2.
7
[Antimicrobial effects and efficacy on habitually hand-washing of strong acidic electrolyzed water--a comparative study of alcoholic antiseptics and soap and tap water].[强酸性电解水的抗菌效果及对手部习惯性清洗的功效——与酒精类防腐剂、肥皂及自来水的比较研究]
Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2002 May;76(5):373-7. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi1970.76.373.
8
Hand hygiene with soap and water is superior to alcohol rub and antiseptic wipes for removal of Clostridium difficile.使用肥皂和水进行手部卫生清洁,在去除艰难梭菌方面优于使用酒精擦手液和消毒湿巾。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;30(10):939-44. doi: 10.1086/605322.
9
Preoperative Hand Decontamination in Ophthalmic Surgery: A Comparison of the Removal of Bacteria from Surgeons' Hands by Routine Antimicrobial Scrub versus an Alcoholic Hand Rub.眼科手术中的术前手部消毒:常规抗菌擦洗与酒精擦手对手术医生手部细菌清除效果的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2017 Sep;42(9):1333-1337. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2017.1304559. Epub 2017 May 30.
10
Effectiveness of liquid soap vs. chlorhexidine gluconate for the removal of Clostridium difficile from bare hands and gloved hands.液体肥皂与葡萄糖酸洗必泰用于去除裸手和戴手套手上艰难梭菌的效果比较
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1994 Nov;15(11):697-702. doi: 10.1086/646840.