Heidemann S R, Buxbaum R E
Department of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824-1101.
Neurotoxicology. 1994 Spring;15(1):95-107.
We review studies from our laboratory over the last 6 years that indicate the mechanical tension on the axons of cultured neurons is a regulator and stimulator of axonal elongation and retraction. Using calibrated glass needles to measure or apply tension, we have accumulated direct evidence for tension as a regulator of four different phases of axonal development: 1) axonal initiation; 2) growth cone-mediated elongation; 3) growth after the growth cone reaches its target; and 4) axonal retraction. Our results can be summarized by a model in which tension levels behave as a three position controller, like a double-pole, double-throw electric switch. The three settings of this switch are separated by tension thresholds: 1) Above the upper threshold, tension acts as a stimulator for axonal elongation and initiation. The growth rate of the neurite is directly proportional to the magnitude of tension on the neurite. Similar levels of tension can initiate neurites de novo from chick sensory neurons. These tension-induced axons are normal in their axial array of microtubules and in the development of a motile growth cone. Under normal conditions of growth, our evidence supports the notion that the growth cone stimulates axonal elongation by acting as a tractor, pulling on the neurite; 2) The "switch" also has a setting for axonal retraction, which occurs at tension magnitudes below some different, lower tension threshold. Our evidence indicates that such axonal retraction involves active force generation by the neurite shaft; and 3) Between the two thresholds, the switch is in a neutral position and the neurite behaves passively as a viscoelastic solid. That is, the neurite stretches in response to tension but there is no true growth, i.e. no microtubule assembly or membrane addition etc. Thus, it seems tension can be regarded as a kind of "second messenger" whose level regulates axonal development. The mechanism of action of developmental neurotoxicants may be to alter the production of, or the sensitivity to, tension. At the least, this evidence that mechanical force regulates axonal growth provides a new avenue of investigation into neurotoxic mechanisms.
我们回顾了过去6年来自我们实验室的研究,这些研究表明,培养神经元轴突上的机械张力是轴突伸长和回缩的调节因子和刺激因子。我们使用校准的玻璃针来测量或施加张力,积累了直接证据,证明张力是轴突发育四个不同阶段的调节因子:1)轴突起始;2)生长锥介导的伸长;3)生长锥到达靶点后的生长;4)轴突回缩。我们的结果可以用一个模型来总结,在这个模型中,张力水平就像一个三位控制器,类似于一个双刀双掷电开关。这个开关的三个设置由张力阈值分隔:1)高于上限阈值时,张力作为轴突伸长和起始的刺激因子。神经突的生长速度与神经突上的张力大小成正比。相似水平的张力可以从鸡感觉神经元中从头引发神经突。这些由张力诱导的轴突在其微管的轴向排列和能动生长锥的发育方面是正常的。在正常生长条件下,我们的证据支持这样一种观点,即生长锥通过充当牵引车拉动神经突来刺激轴突伸长;2)“开关”还有一个轴突回缩的设置,这发生在低于某个不同的、更低的张力阈值的张力大小情况下。我们的证据表明,这种轴突回缩涉及神经突轴干产生的主动力;3)在两个阈值之间,开关处于中性位置,神经突作为粘弹性固体被动表现。也就是说,神经突响应张力而伸展,但没有真正的生长,即没有微管组装或膜添加等。因此,似乎张力可以被视为一种“第二信使”,其水平调节轴突发育。发育性神经毒物的作用机制可能是改变张力的产生或对张力的敏感性。至少,这种机械力调节轴突生长的证据为神经毒性机制的研究提供了一条新途径。