el-Zaatari M M, Martens M G, Anderson G D
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;84(4):609-12.
To determine the rate of the prozone phenomenon in our patient population.
Sera from 4328 patients--3504 females (2065 pregnant, 1439 nonpregnant) and 824 males--were tested for syphilis by the rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test, and then rechecked with serial twofold dilutions of up to 16-fold to detect the prozone phenomenon. Chi-square analysis with Yates correction was used, with P < or = .05 considered significant.
The total positivity rate in females was 6% (213 patients); 13% (27) of the positive tests were false-positive reactions as confirmed by a negative anti-treponemal antibody test. Only one prozone reaction was detected, in serum from a male subject, but it was not missed on initial screening.
The rate of prozone phenomenon is very low (95% confidence interval 0-0.4%), and routine serial dilutions are not cost effective.
确定我院患者群体中前带现象的发生率。
对4328例患者的血清进行快速血浆反应素(RPR)试验以检测梅毒,其中女性3504例(2065例为孕妇,1439例为非孕妇),男性824例,然后用高达16倍的系列两倍稀释法重新检测以检测前带现象。采用Yates校正的卡方分析,P≤0.05认为具有统计学意义。
女性总阳性率为6%(213例患者);经抗梅毒螺旋体抗体检测证实,13%(27例)的阳性检测为假阳性反应。仅在一名男性受试者的血清中检测到一例前带反应,但初次筛查时未漏检。
前带现象的发生率非常低(95%置信区间0-0.4%),常规系列稀释不具有成本效益。