Suppr超能文献

扩张型心肌病的长期预后及预后因素。初步结果。

Long-term outcome and prognostic factors in dilated cardiomyopathy. Preliminary results.

作者信息

Fruhwald F M, Dusleag J, Eber B, Fruhwald S, Zweiker R, Klein W

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Karl-Franzens-University, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

Angiology. 1994 Sep;45(9):763-70. doi: 10.1177/000331979404500903.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

To investigate long-term follow-up and identify prognostic factors in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) the authors investigated 167 consecutive patients on an outpatient basis. All patients underwent left- and right-heart catheterization; follow-up comprised clinical and echocardiographic investigations.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up period of ninety-three +/- thirty-six months 82 patients (49%; 71 men, 11 women, mean age fifty-five +/- eleven years) were alive. 29 of them (27 men, 2 women, mean age fifty-two +/- nine) showed normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after a mean follow-up period of one hundred four +/- forty months. The remaining 53 patients (44 men, 9 women, mean age fifty-six +/- eleven) revealed LVEF similar to that of the first examination. Eighty-five patients died (51%; 73 men, 12 women). Causes of death were the following: progressive heart failure, 24; sudden death, 23; stroke, 3; pulmonary embolism, 2; noncardiac death, 4; unknown causes, 29. The median period from the onset of first symptoms until definite diagnosis was two months in patients with stable conditions, three months in those with normalization of LVEF and twenty-four months in those who died, respectively (P < 0.01). At the time of diagnosis, patients with stable outcome had a mean LVEF (LVEF 1) of 37%, those who returned to normal had 40% (ns). Patients who died had a mean LVEF 1 of 32% and therefore differed significantly from both groups of survivors (P < 0.001). Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) at the time of diagnosis was highest in patients who died (22 mmHg) and therefore differed significantly from both groups of survivors (normalization: 16 mmHg, stable patients: 18 mmHg, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

According to their results, time until diagnosis, LVEF, and LVEDP are prognostic indicators. No difference was noted between the groups concerning etiology, medical treatment, or functional classification according to the New York Heart Association.

摘要

未标注

为了对扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者进行长期随访并确定预后因素,作者对167例连续门诊患者进行了研究。所有患者均接受了左、右心导管检查;随访包括临床和超声心动图检查。

结果

平均随访93±36个月后,82例患者(49%;71例男性,11例女性,平均年龄55±11岁)存活。其中29例(27例男性,2例女性,平均年龄52±9岁)在平均随访104±40个月后左心室射血分数(LVEF)正常。其余53例患者(44例男性,9例女性,平均年龄56±11岁)的LVEF与首次检查时相似。85例患者死亡(51%;73例男性,12例女性)。死亡原因如下:进行性心力衰竭24例;猝死23例;中风3例;肺栓塞2例;非心脏性死亡4例;原因不明29例。首次症状出现至明确诊断的中位时间,病情稳定的患者为2个月,LVEF恢复正常的患者为3个月,死亡患者为24个月(P<0.01)。诊断时,预后稳定的患者平均LVEF(LVEF 1)为37%,恢复正常的患者为40%(无显著性差异)。死亡患者的平均LVEF 1为32%,因此与两组存活者均有显著差异(P<0.001)。诊断时,死亡患者的左心室舒张末期压力(LVEDP)最高(22 mmHg),因此与两组存活者均有显著差异(恢复正常者:16 mmHg,病情稳定患者:18 mmHg,P<0.001)。

结论

根据研究结果,诊断时间、LVEF和LVEDP是预后指标。在病因、药物治疗或纽约心脏协会功能分级方面,两组之间未发现差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验