• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性踝关节损伤中使用X线摄影的临床决策规则验证失败。

Failed validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute ankle injury.

作者信息

Kelly A M, Richards D, Kerr L, Grant J, O'Donovan P, Basire K, Graham R

机构信息

Emergency Department Hutt Hospital, Lower Hutt, New Zealand.

出版信息

N Z Med J. 1994 Jul 27;107(982):294-5.

PMID:8093158
Abstract

AIM

To validate the Ottawa clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries.

METHOD

A prospective, multicentre trial of 350 adult patients presenting with acute ankle injuries consisting of correlation of the features of the Ottawa clinical decision rule with the results of x-rays.

RESULTS

There were 75 fractures in 350 patients, five of which would have been missed by the clinical decision rule. The sensitivity of the rule was 93% with a specificity of 11%. The positive predictive value was 22%, the false negative rate 14%. Fractures that would have been missed by the clinical decision rule included one unstable fracture of the ankle, one fracture of the talus, one calcaneal fracture and one fracture each of the cuboid and navicular.

CONCLUSION

The Ottawa clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries is unacceptable for application in emergency departments in New Zealand due to a high false negative rate.

摘要

目的

验证渥太华急性踝关节损伤X线检查临床决策规则。

方法

一项针对350例急性踝关节损伤成年患者的前瞻性多中心试验,内容为渥太华临床决策规则的特征与X线检查结果的相关性。

结果

350例患者中有75例骨折,其中5例骨折根据临床决策规则会被漏诊。该规则的敏感性为93%,特异性为11%。阳性预测值为22%,假阴性率为14%。根据临床决策规则会被漏诊的骨折包括1例踝关节不稳定骨折、1例距骨骨折、1例跟骨骨折以及各1例骰骨和舟骨骨折。

结论

由于假阴性率较高,渥太华急性踝关节损伤X线检查临床决策规则不适用于新西兰急诊科。

相似文献

1
Failed validation of a clinical decision rule for the use of radiography in acute ankle injury.急性踝关节损伤中使用X线摄影的临床决策规则验证失败。
N Z Med J. 1994 Jul 27;107(982):294-5.
2
Evaluation of the Ottawa clinical decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle and midfoot injuries in the emergency department: an independent site assessment.急诊科急性踝关节和中足损伤中使用X线摄影的渥太华临床决策规则评估:独立机构评估
Ann Emerg Med. 1994 Jul;24(1):41-5. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70160-1.
3
Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.急性踝关节损伤评估中诊断决策规则与结构化数据收集的比较
CMAJ. 2002 Mar 19;166(6):727-33.
4
Prospective validation of a decision rule for the use of radiography in acute knee injuries.急性膝关节损伤中使用X线摄影决策规则的前瞻性验证
JAMA. 1996 Feb 28;275(8):611-5.
5
Implementation of the Ottawa ankle rule in a university sports medicine center.渥太华踝关节规则在大学运动医学中心的应用
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Jan;34(1):57-62. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200201000-00010.
6
Utilization of radiographs for the diagnosis of ankle fractures in Kingston, Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省金斯顿地区 X 光片在踝关节骨折诊断中的应用。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 May;18(5):555-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01058.x. Epub 2011 May 5.
7
[Usefulness of Ottawa rules for acute injuries of ankle and foot].渥太华规则对踝部和足部急性损伤的适用性
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2005 Jul-Aug;43(4):293-8.
8
Decision rules for the use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Refinement and prospective validation.急性踝关节损伤中使用X线摄影的决策规则。细化与前瞻性验证。
JAMA. 1993 Mar 3;269(9):1127-32. doi: 10.1001/jama.269.9.1127.
9
Decision rules for roentgenography of children with acute ankle injuries.急性踝关节损伤儿童的X线摄影决策规则
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 Mar;149(3):255-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170150035005.
10
Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules. Experience at a community hospital.渥太华踝关节规则的验证。一家社区医院的经验。
Can Fam Physician. 1997 Mar;43:459-65.

引用本文的文献

1
Application of the Ottawa Protocol by Medical Students and Orthopedic Residents on Ankle Sprains at a Trauma Hospital.渥太华协议在创伤医院的医学生和骨科住院医师对踝关节扭伤的应用。
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2020 Oct;55(5):620-624. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1702957. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
2
Does the normal four steps weight-bearing rule predict the need for radiography in cases of blunt ankle trauma?正常的四步负重法则能否预测钝性踝关节创伤病例中进行X线检查的必要性?
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017 Jun 16;31:32. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.31.32. eCollection 2017.
3
Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in Indian Scenario.
渥太华踝关节规则在印度情境下的验证。
Arch Trauma Res. 2015 Jun 20;4(2):e20969. doi: 10.5812/atr.4(2)2015.20969. eCollection 2015 Jun.
4
Persistent ankle pain following a sprain: a review of imaging.扭伤后持续的踝关节疼痛:影像学综述
Emerg Radiol. 2011 Jun;18(3):211-25. doi: 10.1007/s10140-011-0945-8. Epub 2011 Mar 5.
5
Risk of tuberculosis is higher with anti-tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibody therapy than with soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor therapy: The three-year prospective French Research Axed on Tolerance of Biotherapies registry.与可溶性肿瘤坏死因子受体疗法相比,抗肿瘤坏死因子单克隆抗体疗法导致结核病的风险更高:基于生物疗法耐受性的法国三年前瞻性研究注册。
Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Jul;60(7):1884-94. doi: 10.1002/art.24632.
6
Accuracy of Ottawa ankle rules to exclude fractures of the ankle and mid-foot: systematic review.渥太华踝关节规则用于排除踝关节和中足骨折的准确性:系统评价
BMJ. 2003 Feb 22;326(7386):417. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7386.417.
7
Comparison of diagnostic decision rules and structured data collection in assessment of acute ankle injury.急性踝关节损伤评估中诊断决策规则与结构化数据收集的比较
CMAJ. 2002 Mar 19;166(6):727-33.
8
Validation of Ottawa ankle rules protocol in Greek athletes: study in the emergency departments of a district general hospital and a sports injuries clinic.渥太华踝关节规则方案在希腊运动员中的验证:在一家地区综合医院急诊科和一家运动损伤诊所进行的研究。
Br J Sports Med. 2001 Dec;35(6):445-7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.35.6.445.
9
[The Ottawa ankle guidelines: analysis of their validity as clinical decision guidelines in the indication of X-rays for ankle and/or middle-foot injuries].《渥太华踝关节指南:踝关节和/或中足损伤X线检查指征临床决策指南的有效性分析》
Aten Primaria. 2001 Jun 30;28(2):129-35. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)78913-5.
10
Validation of the Ottawa ankle rules in children.
J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;16(5):342-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.5.342.