Bevan E G, Pringle S D, Waller P C, Herrick A L, Findlay J G, Murray G D, Carmichael H A, Reid J L, Weir R J, Lorimer A R
Glasgow Blood Pressure Clinic, Western Infirmary, UK.
J Hum Hypertens. 1993 Feb;7(1):83-8.
The antihypertensive, biochemical and adverse effects of captopril, hydralazine, nifedipine and placebo were compared in 160 patients with BP inadequately controlled by atenolol 100 mg daily plus bendrofluazide 5 mg daily. Treatments were given for up to 12 weeks. Beta-blocker and thiazide were continued unchanged. All three active drugs reduced supine BP relative to placebo; mean BP changes attributable to active treatment (95% confidence intervals): captopril 13.4/10.3 mmHg (0.6/4.0 to 26.2/16.6), hydralazine 15.0/10.0 mmHg (1.7/3.4 to 28.3/16.6), nifedipine 16.8/8.1 mmHg (4.0/1.8 to 29.6/14.4). There were no significant differences between the agents. Results for erect BP were similar. Target BP (< 140/95 mmHg) was achieved more frequently on captopril (33%), hydralazine (29%) and nifedipine (17%) than on placebo (10%). Compared with the other treatments captopril increased serum potassium concentration (P = 0.01), and hydralazine reduced serum cholesterol concentration (median changes: captopril -0.2 mmol/l, hydralazine -0.8 mmol/l, nifedipine -0.2 mmol/l, and placebo +0.2 mmol/l, P < 0.001). Overall, side-effects did not differ significantly between the groups; withdrawals resulting from adverse reactions: captopril 15%, hydralazine 24%, nifedipine 22%, and placebo 3% (chi 2 = 8.2, P = 0.04). Captopril, hydralazine and nifedipine did not differ significantly in efficacy and tolerability when added to atenolol and bendrofluazide. However, there were trends in favour of captopril, on which drug the highest proportion of patients had their BP controlled and the lowest proportion were withdrawn because of side-effects. Thus, of the drugs tested, captopril appears to be the best option as third drug in hypertension.
对160例每日服用100mg阿替洛尔加5mg苄氟噻嗪但血压控制不佳的患者,比较了卡托普利、肼屈嗪、硝苯地平和安慰剂的降压效果、生化指标及不良反应。治疗持续12周。β受体阻滞剂和噻嗪类药物剂量不变。与安慰剂相比,所有三种活性药物均降低了仰卧位血压;活性治疗导致的平均血压变化(95%置信区间):卡托普利13.4/10.3mmHg(0.6/4.0至26.2/16.6),肼屈嗪15.0/10.0mmHg(1.7/3.4至28.3/16.6),硝苯地平16.8/8.1mmHg(4.0/1.8至29.6/14.4)。各药物之间无显著差异。直立位血压结果相似。与安慰剂(10%)相比,卡托普利(33%)、肼屈嗪(29%)和硝苯地平(17%)使目标血压(<140/95mmHg)达标更为频繁。与其他治疗相比,卡托普利使血清钾浓度升高(P = 0.01),肼屈嗪使血清胆固醇浓度降低(中位数变化:卡托普利-0.2mmol/L,肼屈嗪-0.8mmol/L,硝苯地平-0.2mmol/L,安慰剂+0.2mmol/L,P<0.001)。总体而言,各组间副作用无显著差异;因不良反应停药率:卡托普利15%,肼屈嗪24%,硝苯地平22%,安慰剂3%(χ2 = 8.2,P = 0.04)。当添加到阿替洛尔和苄氟噻嗪中时,卡托普利、肼屈嗪和硝苯地平在疗效和耐受性方面无显著差异。然而,有倾向于卡托普利的趋势,服用该药物的患者血压控制比例最高,因副作用停药比例最低。因此,在所测试的药物中,卡托普利似乎是高血压治疗中作为第三种药物的最佳选择。