• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双氯芬酸钠在门诊体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)中的阿片类药物节省效应。

The opioid-sparing effect of diclofenac sodium in outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

作者信息

Fredman B, Jedeikin R, Olsfanger D, Aronheim M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Meir Hospital, Kfar Sava, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 1993 Mar-Apr;5(2):141-4. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(93)90142-2.

DOI:10.1016/0952-8180(93)90142-2
PMID:8097400
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the opioid-sparing and analgesic effect of diclofenac sodium in ambulatory nonimmersion extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Large referral hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-seven ASA physical status I and II patients with upper renal tract nephrolithiasis.

INTERVENTIONS

ESWL was performed with a sedative-analgesic technique. Diclofenac sodium 75 mg or an equal volume of saline was given intramuscularly 45 minutes prior to the procedure. Fentanyl and midazolam were added to maintain adequate sedation and analgesia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Demographically, both groups were comparable. In the diclofenac sodium group, heart rate was slightly higher, treatment time was shorter, more shock waves were administered (p < 0.02), and less fentanyl was required (p < 0.02). Mean arterial pressure was lower and arterial oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter was higher in the diclofenac sodium group. There were no differences between the groups in voltage, stone size, fragmentation, dose of midazolam administered, or overall assessment by both the doctors and patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients administered diclofenac sodium received a greater number of shock waves, required less fentanyl, and showed a marginal improvement in hemodynamic stability and oxygenation during ambulatory nonimmersion ESWL.

摘要

研究目的

评估双氯芬酸钠在门诊非浸入式体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)中的阿片类药物节省效应和镇痛效果。

设计

随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

地点

大型转诊医院。

患者

27例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级和II级的上尿路肾结石患者。

干预措施

采用镇静镇痛技术进行ESWL。在手术前45分钟肌肉注射75毫克双氯芬酸钠或等体积的生理盐水。添加芬太尼和咪达唑仑以维持足够的镇静和镇痛。

测量指标和主要结果

在人口统计学方面,两组具有可比性。在双氯芬酸钠组中,心率略高,治疗时间较短,施用的冲击波更多(p < 0.02),所需芬太尼更少(p < 0.02)。双氯芬酸钠组的平均动脉压较低,脉搏血氧饱和度测定的动脉血氧饱和度较高。两组在电压、结石大小、结石破碎情况、咪达唑仑给药剂量或医生和患者的总体评估方面没有差异。

结论

在门诊非浸入式ESWL期间,接受双氯芬酸钠治疗的患者接受了更多的冲击波,所需芬太尼更少,并且在血流动力学稳定性和氧合方面有轻微改善。

相似文献

1
The opioid-sparing effect of diclofenac sodium in outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).双氯芬酸钠在门诊体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)中的阿片类药物节省效应。
J Clin Anesth. 1993 Mar-Apr;5(2):141-4. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(93)90142-2.
2
Comparison of three analgesics for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.三种用于体外冲击波碎石术的镇痛药的比较。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2002;36(4):281-5. doi: 10.1080/003655902320248254.
3
Effects of intravenous ketorolac and fentanyl combined with midazolam on analgesia and side effects during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.静脉注射酮咯酸、芬太尼联合咪达唑仑对体外冲击波碎石术镇痛效果及副作用的影响
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 2002 Mar;40(1):9-12.
4
Dexmedetomidine causes prolonged recovery when compared with midazolam/fentanyl combination in outpatient shock wave lithotripsy.在门诊冲击波碎石术中,与咪达唑仑/芬太尼联合用药相比,右美托咪定导致恢复时间延长。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008 Dec;25(12):961-7. doi: 10.1017/S0265021508004699. Epub 2008 Jun 9.
5
Music decreases anxiety and provides sedation in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.音乐可减轻体外冲击波碎石术中的焦虑并起到镇静作用。
Urology. 2003 Feb;61(2):282-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02375-0.
6
[A comparative study of intravenous opioid analgesia. Sufentanil and alfentanil for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in urologic patients].[静脉注射阿片类药物镇痛的比较研究。舒芬太尼和阿芬太尼用于泌尿外科患者体外冲击波碎石术]
Anaesthesist. 1996 Apr;45(4):330-6. doi: 10.1007/s001010050268.
7
Comparison of three analgesic drug regimens with twelfth subcostal nerve block for pain control during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.三种镇痛药物方案联合第十二肋下神经阻滞在体外冲击波碎石术治疗中的镇痛效果比较。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Jan;50(1):49-53. doi: 10.1007/s11255-017-1746-0. Epub 2017 Nov 18.
8
Comparative study of etofenamate and fentanyl for outpatient extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy.依托芬那酯与芬太尼用于门诊体外冲击波碎石术的对比研究。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2001 Dec;35(6):502-4. doi: 10.1080/003655901753367622.
9
[Epidural fentanyl provide sufficient analgesia for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)].
Masui. 1997 May;46(5):694-9.
10
Patient controlled analgesia for shock wave lithotripsy: the effect of self-administered alfentanil on pain intensity and drug requirement.
J Urol. 1996 Jan;155(1):43-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66534-0.

引用本文的文献

1
[Evaluation of protocols on the use of analgesics for pain management in patients with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)].[体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)患者疼痛管理中镇痛药物使用方案的评估]
Pan Afr Med J. 2019 Mar 8;32:109. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.32.109.17690. eCollection 2019.
2
Analgesia for patients undergoing shockwave lithotripsy for urinary stones - a systematic review and meta-analysis.尿路结石患者体外冲击波碎石术的镇痛——一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Braz J Urol. 2017 May-Jun;43(3):394-406. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0078.
3
Perioperative use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: results of a UK regional audit.
围手术期使用非甾体抗炎药:英国区域审计结果。
Clin Drug Investig. 2009;29(11):703-11. doi: 10.2165/11319610-000000000-00000.
4
Effectiveness of electro-acupuncture compared to sedo-analgesics in relieving pain during shockwave lithotripsy.与镇静镇痛药相比,电针在缓解冲击波碎石术期间疼痛方面的有效性。
Urol Res. 2005 Aug;33(4):285-90. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0473-7. Epub 2005 Jun 22.
5
The patients perspective of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.患者对体外冲击波碎石术的看法。
Int Urol Nephrol. 1998;30(6):671-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02564851.