Suppr超能文献

双氯芬酸钠在门诊体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)中的阿片类药物节省效应。

The opioid-sparing effect of diclofenac sodium in outpatient extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

作者信息

Fredman B, Jedeikin R, Olsfanger D, Aronheim M

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Meir Hospital, Kfar Sava, Israel.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 1993 Mar-Apr;5(2):141-4. doi: 10.1016/0952-8180(93)90142-2.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the opioid-sparing and analgesic effect of diclofenac sodium in ambulatory nonimmersion extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL).

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

SETTING

Large referral hospital.

PATIENTS

Twenty-seven ASA physical status I and II patients with upper renal tract nephrolithiasis.

INTERVENTIONS

ESWL was performed with a sedative-analgesic technique. Diclofenac sodium 75 mg or an equal volume of saline was given intramuscularly 45 minutes prior to the procedure. Fentanyl and midazolam were added to maintain adequate sedation and analgesia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Demographically, both groups were comparable. In the diclofenac sodium group, heart rate was slightly higher, treatment time was shorter, more shock waves were administered (p < 0.02), and less fentanyl was required (p < 0.02). Mean arterial pressure was lower and arterial oxygen saturation by pulse oximeter was higher in the diclofenac sodium group. There were no differences between the groups in voltage, stone size, fragmentation, dose of midazolam administered, or overall assessment by both the doctors and patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients administered diclofenac sodium received a greater number of shock waves, required less fentanyl, and showed a marginal improvement in hemodynamic stability and oxygenation during ambulatory nonimmersion ESWL.

摘要

研究目的

评估双氯芬酸钠在门诊非浸入式体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)中的阿片类药物节省效应和镇痛效果。

设计

随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

地点

大型转诊医院。

患者

27例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级和II级的上尿路肾结石患者。

干预措施

采用镇静镇痛技术进行ESWL。在手术前45分钟肌肉注射75毫克双氯芬酸钠或等体积的生理盐水。添加芬太尼和咪达唑仑以维持足够的镇静和镇痛。

测量指标和主要结果

在人口统计学方面,两组具有可比性。在双氯芬酸钠组中,心率略高,治疗时间较短,施用的冲击波更多(p < 0.02),所需芬太尼更少(p < 0.02)。双氯芬酸钠组的平均动脉压较低,脉搏血氧饱和度测定的动脉血氧饱和度较高。两组在电压、结石大小、结石破碎情况、咪达唑仑给药剂量或医生和患者的总体评估方面没有差异。

结论

在门诊非浸入式ESWL期间,接受双氯芬酸钠治疗的患者接受了更多的冲击波,所需芬太尼更少,并且在血流动力学稳定性和氧合方面有轻微改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验