Suppr超能文献

1992年博尼卡讲座。自闸门控制理论提出以来慢性疼痛管理的进展。

1992 Bonica Lecture. Advances in chronic pain management since gate control.

作者信息

Abram S E

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee 53226.

出版信息

Reg Anesth. 1993 Mar-Apr;18(2):66-81.

PMID:8098221
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Two pain treatment systems that developed soon after the publication of the gate theory are probably a direct result of its publication: neuraxial opiate administration and electrical stimulation of the spinal cord and peripheral nerves and receptors. Although the use of these modalities has become widespread in managing chronic pain, there is disagreement about their long-term efficacy. This presentation will attempt to review the data regarding the mechanisms of action of these modalities and their efficacy in treating chronic pain of malignant and nonmalignant origin.

DATA SOURCES

Data were derived almost entirely from original articles reporting experimental data from both animal and human studies and from series of patients undergoing treatment with the modalities reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION

Where possible, controlled studies were selected. However, much of the available data regarding treatment results are uncontrolled.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Selected data from studies that were felt to be reasonably well conducted are presented or summarized. Because of the lack of control groups in many of the clinical trials, meta-analyses were not carried out.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term spinal opiate administration has been shown to be more effective than systemic opiates in some patients with cancer pain, but often must be combined with local anesthetics to provide satisfactory pain relief. Loss of effect over time is a significant problem. Since the identification of spinal opiate receptors and the introduction of spinally administered narcotics, a number of other receptors that are important in both sensitization and suppression of pain projection systems have been characterized. Agonists and antagonists to many of these receptors are being developed, and a few are available for clinical trials. Long-term electrical stimulation of the spinal cord produces substantial analgesia below the stimulated spinal segments in some patients with chronic pain. Although initial results are usually encouraging, long-term efficacy may be disappointing. It is postulated that analgesia associated with spinal stimulation is associated with both stimulation of large fiber ascending tracts and blockade of spinothalamic pathways. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) has come into widespread use in managing chronic pain and has had limited trials in cancer pain patients. It is well accepted by patients and physicians, but clinical studies of long-term efficacy have yielded variable results. The analgesic action is probably the result of both large afferent fiber activation and blockade of peripheral nociceptors.

摘要

目的

闸门理论发表后不久出现的两种疼痛治疗系统可能是其发表的直接成果:神经轴突给予阿片类药物以及脊髓和周围神经及受体的电刺激。尽管这些方法在慢性疼痛管理中已广泛应用,但关于它们的长期疗效仍存在分歧。本报告将试图回顾有关这些方法的作用机制及其在治疗恶性和非恶性来源慢性疼痛方面疗效的数据。

数据来源

数据几乎完全来自原始文章,这些文章报告了动物和人体研究的实验数据以及接受所审查方法治疗的一系列患者的数据。

研究选择

尽可能选择对照研究。然而,关于治疗结果的现有数据大多没有对照。

数据提取与综合

呈现或总结了认为实施得相当好的研究中的选定数据。由于许多临床试验缺乏对照组,因此未进行荟萃分析。

结论

在一些癌症疼痛患者中,长期脊髓给予阿片类药物已被证明比全身给予阿片类药物更有效,但通常必须与局部麻醉剂联合使用才能提供满意的疼痛缓解。随着时间的推移效果丧失是一个重大问题。自从确定脊髓阿片受体并引入脊髓给予的麻醉剂以来,已经对许多在疼痛投射系统的敏化和抑制中都很重要的其他受体进行了表征。许多这些受体的激动剂和拮抗剂正在研发中,有几种可用于临床试验。对脊髓进行长期电刺激可使一些慢性疼痛患者在受刺激脊髓节段以下产生显著的镇痛作用。尽管最初的结果通常令人鼓舞,但长期疗效可能令人失望。据推测,与脊髓刺激相关的镇痛作用与大纤维上行束的刺激和脊髓丘脑束的阻断有关。经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)在慢性疼痛管理中已广泛应用,在癌症疼痛患者中的试验有限。患者和医生对其接受度很高,但长期疗效的临床研究结果不一。镇痛作用可能是大传入纤维激活和外周伤害感受器阻断共同作用的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验