Ackerman J M, Johansen P A, Clark D, White F J
Department of Neuroscience, University of Health Sciences, Chicago Medical School, Illinois.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993 May;265(2):963-70.
The dopamine (DA) hypothesis of schizophrenia proposes hyperactivity of the mesocorticolimbic DA system, originating within the A10 DA cells of the ventral tegmental area (VTA), as a pathophysiological mechanism. Thus, reduction of activity in this system, including that produced by putative "autoreceptor-selective" DA agonists, may be of clinical utility. The present studies compared the ability of eight D2 DA receptor agonists to inhibit the firing of rat A10 DA neurons after i.v. administration. Both N-n-propyl-N-phenylethyl-p(3-hydorxyphenyl)ethylamine hydrochloride (RU 24213) and 2-amino-6-allyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-4H-thiazolo-[4,5-d]- azepine dihydrochloride (B-HT 920) were potent, high-efficacy agonists which completely inhibited the firing of A10 DA cells. The putative autoreceptor-selective DA agonists 3-(4-(4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridyl-(1)-butyl)-indole hydrochloride (EMD 23,448) and (+)-3-(3-hydroxy-phenyl)-N-n-propylpiperidine [(+)-3-PPP] were considerably weaker than RU 24213 and B-HT 920, but also exhibited "full" efficacy (i.e., they completely suppressed cell firing). The putative autoreceptor agonist preclamol [(-)-3-PPP] and its trans-fused congener (-)-HW 165 were weak partial agonists that failed to completely inhibit A10 DA cells. The new putative autoreceptor agonist N-[(8-alpha)-2-chloro-6-methylergoline-8-yl]-2,3]dimethylopropa namide (SDZ 208-911) was also a weak partial agonist that exhibited partial antagonist effects (reversed inhibition produced by the D2 agonist quinpirole), whereas its structural analog N-[(8-alpha)-2-chloro-6-methylergoline-8-yl]-2,2-dimethylopropa namide (SDZ 208-912) was nearly inactive as an agonist, but was an effective antagonist.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
精神分裂症的多巴胺(DA)假说提出,起源于腹侧被盖区(VTA)的A10 DA细胞的中脑皮质边缘DA系统功能亢进是一种病理生理机制。因此,降低该系统的活性,包括由假定的“自受体选择性”DA激动剂产生的活性,可能具有临床应用价值。本研究比较了8种D2 DA受体激动剂静脉注射后抑制大鼠A10 DA神经元放电的能力。盐酸N-正丙基-N-苯基乙基-p(3-羟基苯基)乙胺(RU 24213)和盐酸2-氨基-6-烯丙基-5,6,7,8-四氢-4H-噻唑并-[4,5-d]-氮杂卓(B-HT 920)都是强效、高效激动剂,能完全抑制A10 DA细胞的放电。假定的自受体选择性DA激动剂盐酸3-(4-(4-苯基-1,2,3,6-四氢吡啶基-(1)-丁基)-吲哚(EMD 23448)和(+)-3-(3-羟基苯基)-N-正丙基哌啶[(+)-3-PPP]比RU 24213和B-HT 920弱得多,但也表现出“完全”效力(即它们完全抑制细胞放电)。假定的自受体激动剂普瑞氯莫[(-)-3-PPP]及其反式稠合同系物(-)-HW 165是弱部分激动剂,不能完全抑制A10 DA细胞。新的假定自受体激动剂N-[(8-α)-2-氯-6-甲基麦角林-8-基]-2,3]二甲基丙酰胺(SDZ 208-911)也是一种弱部分激动剂,表现出部分拮抗作用(逆转D2激动剂喹吡罗产生的抑制作用),而其结构类似物N-[(8-α)-2-氯-6-甲基麦角林-8-基]-2,2-二甲基丙酰胺(SDZ 208-912)作为激动剂几乎无活性,但却是一种有效的拮抗剂。(摘要截短于250字)