Suppr超能文献

[碘伏A在某育肥猪场猪舍的杀菌效果试验]

[Tests on the bactericidal effectiveness of iodophor A in the halls of a pig-fattening station].

作者信息

Kubícek K

出版信息

Vet Med (Praha). 1975 Apr;20(4):185-92.

PMID:809888
Abstract

In the halls of the pig fattening house the bactericidal effectiveness of cold water solutions of Czechoslovakia-made Jodofor A and the product of the Ciba-Geigy company Iosan was tested and compared with the effectiveness of Chloramin B used in a water solution at the temperature of 50 to 60 degrees C. The solutions were applied by fine spraying at the rate of 0.5 lt. per 1 m2 of area. After one hour the spray was applied again at the same rate. One hour after the last Jodofor spray and two hours after the last Chloramin B spray, smears were collected from the disinfected surfaces. The examination included the detection of coliform germs, germs of the Micrococcaceae family, and the determination of the total number of germs. On the whole, 384 smears were examined in four separate trials. The application of Jodofor A in 2% concentrations, after mechanical average-quality purification, did not give acceptable results, in comparison with the solution of Cloramin B. Only when solutions of Jodofor A and Iosan were used in 3% concentration after perfect mechanical purification, satisfactory results were obtained (with the exception of plaster and painted wood), in comparison with the Chloramin B solution. Better disinfectibility was found in aluminium sheet, terracotta, concrete, and metal, as distinct from plaster and painted wood. The comparison of Jodofor A with abroad-male Iosan indicates that Jodofor has the same or a better bactericidal effect than Iosan in all indices. Due to its bactericidal effect, Jodofor A is a suitable disinfectant for preventive disinfection of farm animal houses. In order to achieve results corresponding to those provided by 2% solutions of Chloramin B it is necessary to use at least 3% concentration of Jodofor A. Good mechanical purification is a basic prerequisite for its effectiveness.

摘要

在育肥猪舍内,对捷克斯洛伐克生产的Jodofor A和汽巴 - 嘉基公司的产品Iosan的冷水溶液的杀菌效果进行了测试,并与50至60摄氏度水溶液中使用的氯胺B的效果进行了比较。溶液以每平方米0.5升的速率通过细喷雾施用。一小时后,以相同速率再次进行喷雾。在最后一次Jodofor喷雾后一小时和最后一次氯胺B喷雾后两小时,从消毒表面采集涂片。检查包括检测大肠菌群、微球菌科细菌以及确定细菌总数。总体而言,在四个独立试验中检查了384份涂片。与氯胺B溶液相比,经过机械平均质量净化后,2%浓度的Jodofor A的施用未获得可接受的结果。只有在经过完美机械净化后使用3%浓度的Jodofor A和Iosan溶液时,与氯胺B溶液相比才获得了满意的结果(石膏和涂漆木材除外)。与石膏和涂漆木材不同,在铝板、赤陶、混凝土和金属中发现了更好的消毒效果。Jodofor A与国外的Iosan的比较表明,Jodofor在所有指标上具有与Iosan相同或更好的杀菌效果。由于其杀菌作用,Jodofor A是适合用于农场动物舍预防性消毒的消毒剂。为了获得与2%氯胺B溶液相当的结果,有必要使用至少3%浓度的Jodofor A。良好的机械净化是其有效性的基本前提。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验