Gimson A E, Ramage J K, Panos M Z, Hayllar K, Harrison P M, Williams R, Westaby D
Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, UK.
Lancet. 1993 Aug 14;342(8868):391-4. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92812-8.
Injection sclerotherapy of bleeding oesophageal varices is undoubtedly beneficial but it is associated with a substantial complication rate, and variceal rebleeding is common during the treatment period before variceal obliteration is achieved. We aimed to find out whether endoscopic variceal banding ligation is safer and more effective. The two methods were compared in a randomised controlled trial of 103 patients (54 assigned to banding ligation, and 49 to injection sclerotherapy) of whom 21 (39%) and 23 (47%), respectively, had active bleeding at index endoscopy. Both treatments were highly effective in controlling active haemorrhage (91% and 92% respectively). Variceal obliteration was not achieved for 22 patients in each group, but among those whose varices were eradicated, banding ligation achieved obliteration more quickly than did sclerotherapy (mean 39 [SD 4] vs 72 [7] days, p = 0.004) and in fewer endoscopy sessions (3.4 [2.2] vs 4.9 [3.5], p = 0.006). Rebleeding was less common in the banding ligation group than in the sclerotherapy group (16 [30%] vs 26 [53%], p < 0.05). There was no difference in outcome between the groups, but 14 sclerotherapy patients were withdrawn from the trial (7 for orthotopic liver transplantation) compared with only 5 (1 for liver transplantation) in the banding ligation group (p < 0.05). Complication rates were similar in the two groups. Variceal banding ligation is a safe and effective technique, which obliterates varices more quickly and with a lower rebleeding rate than injection sclerotherapy.
注射硬化疗法治疗出血性食管静脉曲张无疑是有益的,但它伴有较高的并发症发生率,并且在静脉曲张闭塞之前的治疗期间,静脉曲张再出血很常见。我们旨在探究内镜下静脉曲张套扎术是否更安全、更有效。在一项随机对照试验中,对103例患者(54例分配接受套扎术,49例接受注射硬化疗法)比较了这两种方法,其中分别有21例(39%)和23例(47%)在初次内镜检查时出现活动性出血。两种治疗方法在控制活动性出血方面都非常有效(分别为91%和92%)。每组各有22例患者静脉曲张未闭塞,但在静脉曲张被根除的患者中,套扎术比硬化疗法更快实现闭塞(平均39[标准差4]天对72[7]天,p = 0.004),且所需内镜检查次数更少(3.4[2.2]次对4.9[3.5]次,p = 0.006)。套扎术组的再出血比硬化疗法组少见(16例[30%]对26例[53%],p < 0.05)。两组的结局无差异,但硬化疗法组有14例患者退出试验(7例因原位肝移植),而套扎术组仅有5例(1例因肝移植)退出试验(p < 0.05)。两组的并发症发生率相似。静脉曲张套扎术是一种安全有效的技术,与注射硬化疗法相比,它能更快地闭塞静脉曲张,且再出血率更低。