• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单剂量大剂量环磷酰胺联合或不联合重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(rhGM-CSF)后采集多发性骨髓瘤患者外周血干细胞。

Collection of peripheral blood stem cells in multiple myeloma following single high-dose cyclophosphamide with and without recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF).

作者信息

Boiron J M, Marit G, Fabéres C, Cony-Makhoul P, Foures C, Ferrer A M, Cristol G, Sarrat A, Girault D, Reiffers J

机构信息

Unité de greffe de moëlle, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Pessac, France.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 1993 Jul;12(1):49-55.

PMID:8104070
Abstract

High-dose cyclophosphamide (HD-CY; 7 g/m2) was administered to patients suffering from high risk multiple myeloma (MM). The safety of this procedure, the recirculation and collection of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) and the effect of rhGM-CSF and HD-CY were studied. Group I patients (n = 21) were treated with HD-CY alone. Group II patients (n = 10) received 5 micrograms/kg/day rhGM-CSF iv after HD-CY. Neutropenia was shorter in group II (p = 0.01). In group II, the number of circulating colony forming units (CFU-GM) after 14 days was correlated with the number of circulating CFU-GM after 7 days (r = 0.85, p < 0.0001) and with the number of CD34+ cells (r = 0.839, p = 0.01). The total number of mononuclear cells (MNC) and CFU-GM collected per patient was two and seven-fold higher, respectively, in group II (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03). Recovered MNC and CFU-GM were 1.7 and 7-fold higher, respectively, in group II (p = 0.01 and p = 0.004). Our data show that HD-CY is an efficient means of collecting functional PBSC in MM. We suggest that rhGM-CSF is able to further enhance this yield in MM.

摘要

对高危多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者给予大剂量环磷酰胺(HD-CY;7 g/m²)治疗。研究了该治疗方法的安全性、外周血干细胞(PBSC)的再循环和采集以及重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(rhGM-CSF)和HD-CY的效果。I组患者(n = 21)仅接受HD-CY治疗。II组患者(n = 10)在HD-CY治疗后静脉注射5微克/千克/天的rhGM-CSF。II组患者的中性粒细胞减少期较短(p = 0.01)。在II组中,14天后循环集落形成单位(CFU-GM)的数量与7天后循环CFU-GM的数量相关(r = 0.85,p < 0.0001),并与CD34+细胞的数量相关(r = 0.839,p = 0.01)。II组中每位患者采集的单个核细胞(MNC)和CFU-GM的总数分别高出两倍和七倍(p = 0.01和p = 0.03)。II组中回收的MNC和CFU-GM分别高出1.7倍和7倍(p = 0.01和p = 0.004)。我们的数据表明,HD-CY是在MM中采集功能性PBSC的有效方法。我们建议rhGM-CSF能够进一步提高MM中的采集产量。

相似文献

1
Collection of peripheral blood stem cells in multiple myeloma following single high-dose cyclophosphamide with and without recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF).单剂量大剂量环磷酰胺联合或不联合重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(rhGM-CSF)后采集多发性骨髓瘤患者外周血干细胞。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1993 Jul;12(1):49-55.
2
Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells by cyclophosphamide and rhGM-CSF in multiple myeloma.环磷酰胺和重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子动员多发性骨髓瘤患者外周血祖细胞
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1996 Jul;18(1):1-7.
3
Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone.多发性骨髓瘤患者外周血祖细胞动员的比较:大剂量环磷酰胺加粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子与单独使用粒细胞集落刺激因子的对比
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1997 Aug;20(3):211-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1700867.
4
Collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells for autografting with low-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.采用低剂量环磷酰胺加粒细胞集落刺激因子采集外周血祖细胞用于自体移植。
Haematologica. 1998 May;83(5):428-31.
5
Recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rhGM-CSF) subsequent to chemotherapy improves collection of blood stem cells for autografting in patients not eligible for bone marrow harvest.化疗后使用重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(rhGM-CSF)可改善无法进行骨髓采集的患者自体移植时造血干细胞的采集情况。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1992 Jun;9(6):459-65.
6
Mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells by subcutaneous injections of yeast-derived granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor: a phase I-II study.
Stem Cells. 1993 Sep;11(5):445-54. doi: 10.1002/stem.5530110512.
7
CD34+ cells mobilized by cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are functionally different from CD34+ cells mobilized by G-CSF.由环磷酰胺和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)动员的CD34+细胞在功能上不同于由G-CSF动员的CD34+细胞。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Mar;21(6):561-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701133.
8
Role of recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor for large scale collection of peripheral blood stem cells for autologous transplantation.重组人粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子在大规模采集自体外周血干细胞用于自体移植中的作用。
Haematologica. 1990 Jan-Feb;75 Suppl 1:22-5.
9
Recombinant human granulocyte and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF and GM-CSF) administered following cytotoxic chemotherapy have a similar ability to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells.在细胞毒性化疗后给予重组人粒细胞和粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF和GM-CSF),它们动员外周血干细胞的能力相似。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Oct;22(7):625-30. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701422.
10
Proliferative response of human marrow myeloid progenitor cells to in vivo treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone and in combination with interleukin-3 after autologous bone marrow transplantation.自体骨髓移植后,人骨髓髓系祖细胞对单独使用粒细胞集落刺激因子以及联合白细胞介素-3进行体内治疗的增殖反应。
Exp Hematol. 1995 Dec;23(14):1520-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma comparison of two consecutive regimens in a limited resources country.多发性骨髓瘤中外周血干细胞动员:资源有限国家两种连续方案的比较
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017 Feb;52(2):222-227. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2016.246. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
2
Comparison of high-dose CY and growth factor with growth factor alone for mobilization of stem cells for transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma.大剂量环磷酰胺与生长因子联合应用和单独使用生长因子对多发性骨髓瘤患者进行干细胞动员以用于移植的比较。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009 Apr;43(8):619-25. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2008.369. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
3
A comparative review of colony-stimulating factors.
集落刺激因子的比较综述
Drugs. 1997 Nov;54(5):709-29. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199754050-00004.
4
Optimizing the effectiveness of hematopoietic growth factors.优化造血生长因子的有效性。
J Clin Immunol. 1994 Jul;14(4):215-23. doi: 10.1007/BF01552307.