Schlaphoff T E, Reavis S C, Rousseau J, Creemers P C, du Toit E D
Provincial Laboratory for Tissue Immunology, Cape Town, Republic of South Africa.
Transfusion. 1993 Sep;33(9):751-3. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1993.33994025026.x.
Disputed paternity cases are routinely tested in the authors' laboratory for red cell antigen, plasma protein, red cell enzyme, and HLA polymorphisms. This report concerns two cases in which the above test results made exclusion of paternity doubtful. In one case, exclusion of paternity was based on one discrepancy in the Duffy blood group system only, a unique situation in the investigators' experience of more than 2500 cases; the investigators were, therefore, reluctant to use this as the only evidence of exclusion. In the other case, it was necessary to postulate the presence of a rare haplotype, MSu, in the MNS blood group system to explain paternity. It was therefore decided to investigate allelic variable number of tandem-repeat (VNTR) DNA polymorphisms in these disputed paternity trios. VNTR DNA typing convincingly excluded these accused men from paternity.
在作者的实验室中,对有争议的亲子鉴定案例常规进行红细胞抗原、血浆蛋白、红细胞酶和HLA多态性检测。本报告涉及两起案例,上述检测结果使亲子关系的排除存疑。在一个案例中,仅基于达菲血型系统中的一处差异排除亲子关系,这在调查人员超过2500例的经验中是独特情况;因此,调查人员不愿将此作为排除亲子关系的唯一证据。在另一个案例中,有必要假定MNS血型系统中存在一种罕见单倍型MSu来解释亲子关系。因此决定对这些有争议的亲子鉴定三人组进行等位基因可变数目串联重复(VNTR)DNA多态性调查。VNTR DNA分型令人信服地排除了这些被指控男子的亲子关系。