Fujita N, Chazouilleres A F, Hartiala J J, O'Sullivan M, Heidenreich P, Kaplan J D, Sakuma H, Foster E, Caputo G R, Higgins C B
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0628.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Mar 15;23(4):951-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90642-4.
The feasibility of velocity-encoded cine nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging to measure regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction in patients with mitral regurgitation was evaluated.
Velocity-encoded cine NMR imaging has been reported to provide accurate measurement of the volume of blood flow in the ascending aorta and through the mitral annulus. Therefore, we hypothesized that the difference between mitral inflow and aortic systolic flow provides the regurgitant volume in the setting of mitral regurgitation.
Using velocity-encoded cine NMR imaging at a magnet field strength of 1.5 T and color Doppler echocardiography, 19 patients with isolated mitral regurgitation and 10 normal subjects were studied. Velocity-encoded cine NMR images were acquired in the short-axis plane of the ascending aorta and from the short-axis plane of the left ventricle at the level of the mitral annulus. Two independent observers measured the ascending aortic flow volume and left ventricular inflow volume to calculate the regurgitant volume as the difference between left ventricular inflow volume and aortic flow volume, and the regurgitant fraction was calculated. Using accepted criteria of color flow Doppler imaging and spectral analysis, the severity of mitral regurgitation was qualitatively graded as mild, moderate or severe and compared with regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction, as determined by velocity-encoded cine NMR imaging.
In normal subjects the regurgitant volume was -6 +/- 345 ml/min (mean +/- SD). In patients with mild, moderate and severe mitral regurgitation, the regurgitant volume was 156 +/- 203, 1,384 +/- 437 and 4,763 +/- 2,449 ml/min, respectively. In normal subjects the regurgitant fraction was 0.7 +/- 6.1%. In patients with mild, moderate and severe mitral regurgitation, the regurgitant fraction was 3.1 +/- 3.4%, 24.5 +/- 8.9% and 48.6 +/- 7.6%, respectively. The regurgitant fraction correlated well with the echocardiographic severity of mitral regurgitation (r = 0.87). Interobserver reproducibilities for regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction were excellent (r = 0.99, SEE = 238 ml; r = 0.98, SEE = 4.1%, respectively).
These findings suggest that velocity-encoded NMR imaging can be used to estimate regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction in patients with mitral regurgitation and can discriminate patients with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation from normal subjects and patients with mild regurgitation. It may be useful for monitoring the effect of therapy intended to reduce the severity of mitral regurgitation.
评估速度编码电影磁共振成像(NMR)测量二尖瓣反流患者反流容积和反流分数的可行性。
据报道,速度编码电影NMR成像可准确测量升主动脉和二尖瓣环处的血流容积。因此,我们假设二尖瓣流入量与主动脉收缩期血流量之间的差值可得出二尖瓣反流情况下的反流容积。
使用1.5T磁场强度的速度编码电影NMR成像和彩色多普勒超声心动图,对19例孤立性二尖瓣反流患者和10名正常受试者进行研究。在升主动脉短轴平面和二尖瓣环水平的左心室短轴平面采集速度编码电影NMR图像。两名独立观察者测量升主动脉血流量和左心室流入量,计算反流容积为左心室流入量与主动脉血流量之差,并计算反流分数。采用彩色血流多普勒成像和频谱分析的公认标准,将二尖瓣反流的严重程度定性分为轻度、中度或重度,并与速度编码电影NMR成像测定的反流容积和反流分数进行比较。
正常受试者的反流容积为-6±345ml/min(平均值±标准差)。轻度、中度和重度二尖瓣反流患者的反流容积分别为156±203、1384±437和4763±2449ml/min。正常受试者的反流分数为0.7±6.1%。轻度、中度和重度二尖瓣反流患者的反流分数分别为3.1±3.4%、24.5±8.9%和48.6±7.6%。反流分数与二尖瓣反流的超声心动图严重程度相关性良好(r=0.87)。观察者间对反流容积和反流分数的可重复性极佳(r分别为0.99,标准误为238ml;r为0.98,标准误为4.1%)。
这些发现表明,速度编码NMR成像可用于估计二尖瓣反流患者的反流容积和反流分数,并可区分中度或重度二尖瓣反流患者与正常受试者及轻度反流患者。它可能有助于监测旨在降低二尖瓣反流严重程度的治疗效果。