Dittmann H, Voelker W, Karsch K R, Seipel L
Medizinische Klinik III, Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen.
Klin Wochenschr. 1989 Sep 15;67(18):940-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01721421.
The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy and clinical utility of pulsed Doppler echocardiography in determining the regurgitant fraction in patients with pure mitral regurgitation. In 30 unselected consecutive patients with mitral regurgitation and in 20 patients without valvular heart disease pulsed Doppler echocardiography was performed to measure blood flow at the mitral and aortic valve. The regurgitant blood volume was calculated as the difference of the stroke volumes measured at the mitral and aortic valve. The regurgitant fraction was computed as regurgitant blood volume/mitral flow. By cardiac catheterization regurgitant blood volume and regurgitant fraction were obtained from the left ventricular angiographic stroke volume and the stroke volume measured by thermodilution. Five patients were excluded because of technically poor left ventricular angiograms. In 4 patients with mitral regurgitation measurement of the regurgitant blood volume and regurgitant fraction was impossible by Doppler because of poor ultrasound signal quality. In 21 patients with mitral regurgitation the correlations between the invasive and the Doppler measurements were significant (regurgitant blood volume: r = 0.89, SEE = 20.9 ml; regurgitant fraction: r = 0.91, SEE = 7.1%). However, the mean percent error of the regurgitant fraction measurement (12.0 +/- 11.6%) was smaller than of the regurgitant blood volume measurement (24.9 +/- 17.0%). In the control group the regurgitant blood volume ranged between -25.1 ml and 11.6 ml and the regurgitant fraction between -17.7% and 12.4%. Thus, pulsed Doppler echocardiography is clinically useful in determination of the regurgitant fraction in 84% of unselected adult patients with pure mitral regurgitation. The Doppler method is limited in the diagnosis and quantification of mild regurgitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究的目的是评估脉冲多普勒超声心动图在确定单纯二尖瓣反流患者反流分数方面的准确性和临床实用性。对30例连续入选的二尖瓣反流患者和20例无瓣膜性心脏病患者进行脉冲多普勒超声心动图检查,以测量二尖瓣和主动脉瓣处的血流。反流血量计算为二尖瓣和主动脉瓣处测得的每搏量之差。反流分数计算为反流血量/二尖瓣血流。通过心导管检查,从左心室造影每搏量和热稀释法测得的每搏量中获得反流血量和反流分数。5例患者因左心室造影技术不佳被排除。4例二尖瓣反流患者因超声信号质量差,无法用多普勒测量反流血量和反流分数。21例二尖瓣反流患者的有创测量与多普勒测量之间存在显著相关性(反流血量:r = 0.89,标准误 = 20.9 ml;反流分数:r = 0.91,标准误 = 7.1%)。然而,反流分数测量的平均百分比误差(12.0±11.6%)小于反流血量测量的平均百分比误差(24.9±17.0%)。在对照组中,反流血量在 -25.1 ml至11.6 ml之间,反流分数在 -17.7%至12.4%之间。因此,脉冲多普勒超声心动图在84%未经选择的单纯二尖瓣反流成年患者中,对确定反流分数具有临床实用性。多普勒方法在轻度反流的诊断和定量方面存在局限性。(摘要截断于250字)