Ando S, Imaizumi T, Takeshita A
Research Institute of Angiocardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
J Auton Nerv Syst. 1993 Dec;45(3):225-33. doi: 10.1016/0165-1838(93)90054-x.
It is now well known that sympathetic nerve discharges (SND) of animals as well as humans oscillate at low frequencies. To determine effects of the oscillation or burst on vasoconstriction, we applied two different kinds of electrical stimulation of the lumbar sympathetic nerve, and examined the magnitude and rate of vasoconstriction in the autoperfused hindquarter of alpha-chloralose anesthetized rabbits (n = 6). In the first protocol, we obtained power spectra of lumbar SND of rabbits with sinoaortic denervation and vagotomy. The power resided over the frequency range of 0.5-5 Hz with a broad peak at 1 Hz. In the second protocol, we modulated the basal stimulus trains 5 Hz on an average with slower rhythms of 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 Hz (frequency modulation). This experiment revealed that, compared with the results with constant stimulation, the frequency modulation of stimulation did not affect the magnitude of the maximal vasoconstriction but augmented the rate of vasoconstriction at 0.5 and 1.0 Hz (P < 0.01). In the third protocol, we examined effects of stimulation on vasoconstriction while changing the intra-burst frequency at a fixed inter-burst interval. Since the power spectra of lumbar SND showed a peak at 1 Hz in the first protocol, we fixed the inter-burst interval at 1 Hz and varied the intra-burst frequency at 10, 20, and 40 Hz while the total number of stimuli were kept constant at 5 impulses per second. This experiment showed that the 10 Hz burst was most effective in augmenting the rate of vasoconstriction, though the magnitude of maximal vasoconstriction was not affected by any of them.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
现在众所周知,动物以及人类的交感神经放电(SND)会以低频振荡。为了确定这种振荡或脉冲对血管收缩的影响,我们对腰交感神经施加了两种不同类型的电刺激,并在α-氯醛糖麻醉的兔子(n = 6)的自体灌注后肢中检测了血管收缩的幅度和速率。在第一个方案中,我们获得了去窦主动脉神经和迷走神经切断的兔子腰SND的功率谱。功率分布在0.5 - 5Hz的频率范围内,在1Hz处有一个宽峰。在第二个方案中,我们以0.5、1.0和2.0Hz的较慢节律(频率调制)平均调制5Hz的基础刺激序列。该实验表明,与恒定刺激的结果相比,刺激的频率调制不影响最大血管收缩的幅度,但在0.5和1.0Hz时增加了血管收缩的速率(P < 0.01)。在第三个方案中,我们在固定脉冲间隔的同时改变脉冲内频率,研究刺激对血管收缩的影响。由于在第一个方案中腰SND的功率谱在1Hz处有一个峰值,我们将脉冲间隔固定在1Hz,并将脉冲内频率分别设置为10、20和40Hz,同时刺激总数保持恒定在每秒5次脉冲。该实验表明,10Hz的脉冲在增加血管收缩速率方面最有效,尽管最大血管收缩的幅度不受任何一种频率的影响。(摘要截断于250字)