Magruder B, Whitbeck L B, Ishii-Kuntz M
Department of Sociology, Iowa State University, Ames 50010.
J Homosex. 1993;25(4):47-68. doi: 10.1300/J082v25n04_04.
Using a sample of 914 college students from the Midwest and West Coast, this research compared two possible relationships between information sources about AIDS and homophobic attitudes. The first model examined the effects of various information sources on students' accuracy of knowledge regarding AIDS transmission, subsequent beliefs that homosexuals are responsible for AIDS, and overall homophobia. The second model tested the alternative hypothesis that pre-existing homophobic attitudes affected the selection of information sources. This assortive process, in turn, was hypothesized to affect accuracy of knowledge about AIDS and beliefs that homosexuals are responsible for AIDS. The findings indicated the models had similar explanatory power, suggesting that information sources have diverse impacts on students' knowledge about AIDS and that homophobic attitudes affect selection of information sources. The authors conclude that while certain information sources about AIDS tend to increase homophobic attitudes, homophobic individuals are also more likely to select these information sources.
本研究以来自美国中西部和西海岸的914名大学生为样本,比较了艾滋病信息来源与恐同态度之间两种可能的关系。第一个模型考察了各种信息来源对学生关于艾滋病传播知识的准确性、随后认为同性恋者应对艾滋病负责的信念以及总体恐同情绪的影响。第二个模型检验了另一种假设,即预先存在的恐同态度会影响信息来源的选择。反过来,这种选择性过程被假定会影响关于艾滋病知识的准确性以及认为同性恋者应对艾滋病负责的信念。研究结果表明,这两个模型具有相似的解释力,这表明信息来源对学生关于艾滋病的知识有不同的影响,而且恐同态度会影响信息来源的选择。作者得出结论,虽然某些关于艾滋病的信息来源往往会增加恐同态度,但恐同的个体也更有可能选择这些信息来源。