Suppr超能文献

EZ-SCREEN大麻素检测的有效性测试。

Validity testing of the EZ-SCREEN cannabinoid test.

作者信息

Jenkins A J, Mills L C, Darwin W D, Huestis M A, Cone E J, Mitchell J M

机构信息

Addiction Research Center, NIDA, Baltimore, MD 21224.

出版信息

J Anal Toxicol. 1993 Sep;17(5):292-8. doi: 10.1093/jat/17.5.292.

Abstract

Recently, a number of "quick tests" became available for use in on-site drug testing. These tests offer advantages in simplicity, ease of performance, and rapid access to test results. However, there is a paucity of data on the validity of these tests for the detection of drugs of abuse. This report describes a validity study of the EZ-SCREEN cannabinoid test for the detection of cannabinoids in urine. Three healthy, male volunteers with a history of marijuana use participated in the study. Each subject smoked 1, 2, or 4 marijuana cigarettes (2.6% THC) on each test day. Urine samples were collected and incorporated into a specimen set consisting of 178 clinical urine samples, 72 urine samples containing known amounts of drug, and 50 drug-free urine samples. The specimen set was randomized and analyzed under blind conditions by the EZ-SCREEN test and by GC/MS for 11-nor-9-carboxy-delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THCCOOH). Results were interpreted independently by three readers. Concordance analysis was performed by comparison of results of the EZ-SCREEN test with GC/MS. The EZ-SCREEN test was highly sensitive and produced positive results at a standard THCCOOH concentration of 5 ng/mL. While showing high sensitivity to THCCOOH, the assay demonstrated low cross-reactivity with delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and other cannabinoids. No false-positive results were recorded with 50 drug-free urine samples, but one reader recorded eight undecided results. Overall agreement between the three readers for the EZ-Screen results was approximately 80%. Delayed readings and photocopy readings tended to be less accurate than readings obtained at 3 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

最近,有多种“快速检测法”可用于现场药物检测。这些检测法在操作简便性、易于实施以及能快速获取检测结果方面具有优势。然而,关于这些检测法在检测滥用药物有效性方面的数据却很匮乏。本报告描述了一项关于EZ-SCREEN大麻素检测法检测尿液中大麻素有效性的研究。三名有吸食大麻史的健康男性志愿者参与了该研究。在每个检测日,每位受试者吸食1支、2支或4支大麻烟(四氢大麻酚含量为2.6%)。收集尿液样本并将其纳入一个样本集,该样本集由178份临床尿液样本、72份含有已知量药物的尿液样本以及50份不含药物的尿液样本组成。样本集经随机分组后,在盲法条件下通过EZ-SCREEN检测法和气相色谱/质谱联用仪检测11-去甲-9-羧基-Δ9-四氢大麻酚(THCCOOH)。结果由三名读者独立解读。通过比较EZ-SCREEN检测法与气相色谱/质谱联用仪的结果进行一致性分析。EZ-SCREEN检测法具有高度敏感性,在THCCOOH标准浓度为5纳克/毫升时产生阳性结果。该检测法虽然对THCCOOH具有高敏感性,但与Δ9-四氢大麻酚(THC)及其他大麻素的交叉反应性较低。50份不含药物的尿液样本未记录到假阳性结果,但有一名读者记录了8个不确定结果。三名读者对EZ-Screen结果的总体一致性约为80%。延迟读数和影印读数往往不如3分钟时获得的读数准确。(摘要截选至250词)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验