Rettinger S D, Kennedy S C, Wu X, Saylors R L, Hafenrichter D G, Flye M W, Ponder K P
Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Feb 15;91(4):1460-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.4.1460.
Liver-directed gene therapy will be applicable to many inherited diseases. Although various protocols have been devised for in vivo delivery of retrovirus, comparison of hepatocyte transduction frequencies has been difficult due to variations in retroviral titer and a paucity of DNA data. We have previously reported an in vivo rat hepatocyte transduction technique which involves 70% hepatectomy followed 24 hr later by portal vein injection of retrovirus during hepatic in-flow occlusion. In this study, we employed this method and concentrated retroviral preparations to achieve transduction of up to 15% of hepatocytes as determined by a quantitative PCR assay. As an initial step toward identifying promoters which lead to high-level long-term expression of retroviral transduced genes, we used our in vivo delivery system to compare the Moloney murine leukemia virus long terminal repeat (LTR) promoter with the promoter for the large subunit of murine RNA polymerase II (Pol-II). Human alpha 1-antitrypsin (hAAT) was used as the reporter gene to facilitate long-term analysis of expression. Serum hAAT levels were higher for the Pol-II promoter (143 ng/ml) than for the LTR promoter (50 ng/ml). This difference was consistent with the higher transduction frequency observed for the Pol-II-hAAT vector. Although serum hAAT expression was sustained for up to 1 year in six of eight Pol-II-hAAT-transduced rats and three of five LTR-hAAT-transduced rats and was proportional to hAAT mRNA level and proviral DNA frequency, in vivo expression was significantly lower than in transduced tissue culture cells. We conclude that a high frequency of in vivo transduction can be achieved by using retroviral vectors and our rapid transduction protocol, but transduced gene expression remains a serious problem. The quantitative assays described herein will facilitate in vivo comparisons of gene regulatory elements.
肝脏导向基因治疗将适用于多种遗传性疾病。尽管已经设计了各种用于逆转录病毒体内递送的方案,但由于逆转录病毒滴度的变化和DNA数据的缺乏,肝细胞转导频率的比较一直很困难。我们之前报道了一种体内大鼠肝细胞转导技术,该技术包括70%肝切除术,24小时后在肝血流阻断期间通过门静脉注射逆转录病毒。在本研究中,我们采用了这种方法并浓缩了逆转录病毒制剂,通过定量PCR测定法确定,可实现高达15%的肝细胞转导。作为鉴定导致逆转录病毒转导基因高水平长期表达的启动子的第一步,我们使用体内递送系统比较莫洛尼鼠白血病病毒长末端重复序列(LTR)启动子与鼠RNA聚合酶II(Pol-II)大亚基的启动子。人α1-抗胰蛋白酶(hAAT)用作报告基因,以促进表达的长期分析。Pol-II启动子组的血清hAAT水平(143 ng/ml)高于LTR启动子组(50 ng/ml)。这种差异与Pol-II-hAAT载体观察到的较高转导频率一致。尽管在八只接受Pol-II-hAAT转导的大鼠中有六只和五只接受LTR-hAAT转导的大鼠中有三只血清hAAT表达持续长达1年,并且与hAAT mRNA水平和前病毒DNA频率成正比,但体内表达明显低于转导的组织培养细胞。我们得出结论,通过使用逆转录病毒载体和我们的快速转导方案可以实现体内转导的高频率,但转导基因的表达仍然是一个严重问题。本文所述的定量测定将有助于体内比较基因调控元件。