Suppr超能文献

美国献血者中人类嗜T淋巴细胞病毒I型和II型补充血清学检测的准确性。逆转录病毒流行病学献血者研究。

Accuracy of supplementary serologic testing for human T-lymphotropic virus types I and II in US blood donors. Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study.

作者信息

Busch M P, Laycock M, Kleinman S H, Wages J W, Calabro M, Kaplan J E, Khabbaz R F, Hollingsworth C G

机构信息

Irwin Memorial Blood Centers, San Francisco, CA 94118.

出版信息

Blood. 1994 Feb 15;83(4):1143-8.

PMID:8111054
Abstract

Blood donations in the United States have been screened for antibody to human T-lymphotropic virus type I (HTLV-I) by HTLV-I enzyme immunoassay (EIA) since November 1988. Specimens repeatedly found to be reactive by EIA undergo confirmation by supplementary serologic tests. We assessed the accuracy of blood center testing of 994 HTLV-I EIA repeat-reactive specimens in five US blood centers between November 1988 and December 1991. Of 410 confirmed HTLV-I/II donations, 407 (99.3%) were infected with HTLV-I/II, as determined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (403 cases) and by repeat serologic testing (4 cases). The three false-positive results occurred in the first year of testing. Of 425 HTLV-indeterminate specimens, 6 (1.4%) were found to be infected by PCR (5 with HTLV-II and 1 with HTLV-I). None of 159 confirmatory test-negative donations was PCR positive. Of HTLV-I/II-seropositive specimens, 80.2% to 95.4% could be typed as HTLV-I or HTLV-II by type-specific serologic assays. These results support recommendations that HTLV-I/II-seropositive donors should be advised that they are infected with HTLV-I, HTLV-II, or HTLV-I/II (depending on results of type-specific assays). HTLV-indeterminate donors should be advised that their results only rarely indicate HTLV infection. HTLV confirmatory test-negative donors should be reassured that they are not infected with HTLV-I or HTLV-II.

摘要

自1988年11月以来,美国的血液捐赠一直通过人类嗜T淋巴细胞病毒I型(HTLV-I)酶免疫测定(EIA)来筛查抗HTLV-I抗体。经EIA反复检测呈反应性的标本需通过补充血清学检测进行确认。我们评估了1988年11月至1991年12月期间美国五个血液中心对994份HTLV-I EIA反复反应性标本进行检测的准确性。在410份经确认的HTLV-I/II捐赠中,通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)(403例)和重复血清学检测(4例)确定,407份(99.3%)感染了HTLV-I/II。三个假阳性结果出现在检测的第一年。在425份HTLV结果不确定的标本中,有6份(1.4%)通过PCR检测发现感染(5份感染HTLV-II,1份感染HTLV-I)。159份确认检测阴性的捐赠中没有一份PCR呈阳性。在HTLV-I/II血清阳性标本中,80.2%至95.4%可通过型特异性血清学检测分型为HTLV-I或HTLV-II。这些结果支持以下建议:应告知HTLV-I/II血清阳性的捐赠者,他们感染了HTLV-I、HTLV-II或HTLV-I/II(取决于型特异性检测结果)。应告知HTLV结果不确定的捐赠者,他们的检测结果很少表明感染了HTLV。应让HTLV确认检测阴性的捐赠者放心,他们没有感染HTLV-I或HTLV-II。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验