de Nictolis M, Montironi R, Tommasoni S, Valli M, Pisani E, Fabris G, Prat J
Department of Pathology, Ospedale Generale Umberto I, Ancona University, Italy.
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 1994 Jan;13(1):10-21. doi: 10.1097/00004347-199401000-00002.
Mucinous ovarian tumors are still a subject of controversy because they can show either intestinal or endocervical differentiation. Morphologic distinction between borderline and malignant tumors is sometimes difficult, and their clinical behavior has not been definitively ascertained. We selected 10 mucinous cystadenomas (MCAs), 32 intestinal mucinous borderline tumors (IMBTs), and 15 well-differentiated mucinous carcinomas (MCCs), all with goblet cells, at least focally. In all cases, we studied the clinicopathologic features, mucin content, intermediate filament expression, and some nuclear quantitative features, namely, the volume-corrected mitotic index (M/Vi), percentage of nucleolated nuclei, mean number of nucleoli per nucleus, percentage of nucleoli touching the nuclear membrane, and mean nuclear area. The quantitative nuclear study included cytometric DNA analysis and the results were expressed as relative mean ploidy value (RMPV) and as diploid-tetraploid or aneuploid histograms. The results of the quantitative study were evaluated statistically. All patients had stage IA tumors, had received surgical therapy only, and were alive and well after a follow-up of more than 5 years. Light microscopic examination revealed that destructive stromal invasion was not present in any MCCs and that IMBTs and MCCs were easily recognizable using the Hart and Norris criteria, later expanded by Hart. Mucin histochemistry and intermediate filament immunohistochemistry failed to detect substantial differences between the diagnostic categories. DNA analysis demonstrated an increase in aneuploid tumors going from IMBTs to MCCs, but these differences were not statistically significant. On the other hand, nuclear quantitative morphology showed significant differences among the three groups of tumors for all features considered. Forward stepwise discriminant analysis highlighted that MCAs, IMBTs, and MCCs were contiguous but different categories. These data support the separation of IMBTs and MCCs into morphologically different categories as underlined by the results of quantitative nuclear morphologic analysis. The favorable outcome of all patients confirms the excellent prognosis of stage I IMBTs and suggests that well-differentiated MCCs without destructive stromal invasion at stage IA could be assimilated, in terms of prognosis and therapy, into stage I IMBTs.
黏液性卵巢肿瘤仍是一个存在争议的主题,因为它们可表现出肠型或宫颈内膜型分化。交界性肿瘤与恶性肿瘤之间的形态学区分有时很困难,并且它们的临床行为尚未得到确切确定。我们选取了10例黏液性囊腺瘤(MCA)、32例肠型黏液性交界性肿瘤(IMBT)和15例高分化黏液性癌(MCC),所有病例均至少局灶性含有杯状细胞。在所有病例中,我们研究了临床病理特征、黏液含量、中间丝表达以及一些核定量特征,即体积校正有丝分裂指数(M/Vi)、核仁化细胞核的百分比、每个细胞核的平均核仁数、接触核膜的核仁百分比以及平均核面积。核定量研究包括细胞计量DNA分析,结果以相对平均倍体值(RMPV)以及二倍体 - 四倍体或非整倍体直方图表示。对定量研究结果进行统计学评估。所有患者均为IA期肿瘤,仅接受了手术治疗,且在随访超过5年后均存活且状况良好。光镜检查显示,任何MCC均未出现破坏性间质浸润,并且使用Hart和Norris标准(后经Hart扩展)可轻松识别IMBT和MCC。黏液组织化学和中间丝免疫组织化学未能检测出诊断类别之间的实质性差异。DNA分析显示,从IMBT到MCC,非整倍体肿瘤有所增加,但这些差异无统计学意义。另一方面,核定量形态学显示,对于所考虑的所有特征,三组肿瘤之间存在显著差异。向前逐步判别分析突出显示,MCA、IMBT和MCC是连续但不同的类别。这些数据支持将IMBT和MCC分为形态学上不同的类别,这一点正如核定量形态学分析结果所强调的。所有患者的良好结局证实了I期IMBT的良好预后,并表明IA期无破坏性间质浸润的高分化MCC在预后和治疗方面可归为I期IMBT。