• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家长对疫苗信息手册的反应。

Parents' responses to vaccine information pamphlets.

作者信息

Clayton E W, Hickson G B, Miller C S

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 1994 Mar;93(3):369-72.

PMID:8115193
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess parents' knowledge and opinions about immunizations and immunization practices before and after introduction of vaccine information pamphlets.

RESEARCH DESIGN

Telephone questionnaire administered to parents whose children received immunizations in the preceding week.

SETTING

Six private pediatric practices in Nashville area and resident continuity clinic at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

PARTICIPANTS

Parents whose children were scheduled to receive immunizations were asked to participate. Interviews were completed with 177 parents whose children received immunizations before and 156 parents after pamphlets were introduced. These two groups of parents had similar demographic characteristics.

RESULTS

Parents who received vaccine information pamphlets learned more about vaccines (2.38 facts/parent after vs 1.18/parent before vaccine information pamphlets, z = -6.28, P < .0001) and were more eager to obtain immunizations for their children (76% vs 38%, chi 2 = 47.24, P < .001). Receipt of pamphlets did not make parents significantly more likely to report side effects from vaccines (63% after vs 55% before, NS) but tended to make them less likely to turn to non health care providers for information (58% after vs 69% before, chi 2 = 3.73, P = .06). Parents who received pamphlets, however, said more often that they received too much information (20% vs 4%, chi 2 = 14.9, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccine information pamphlets enhanced parents' knowledge and acceptance of immunizations. There is room for further improvement.

摘要

目的

评估在引入疫苗信息手册前后,家长对免疫接种及免疫接种实践的了解程度和看法。

研究设计

对前一周为孩子接种疫苗的家长进行电话问卷调查。

研究地点

纳什维尔地区的六家私立儿科诊所及范德堡大学医学中心的住院连续性诊所。

研究对象

其孩子计划接种疫苗的家长被邀请参与。完成了对177名孩子在引入手册前接种疫苗的家长及156名孩子在引入手册后接种疫苗的家长的访谈。这两组家长的人口统计学特征相似。

结果

收到疫苗信息手册的家长对疫苗了解更多(收到手册后每位家长了解2.38个知识点,收到手册前为每位家长1.18个知识点,z = -6.28,P < .0001),并且更渴望为孩子接种疫苗(76% 对38%,χ2 = 47.24,P < .001)。收到手册并没有使家长更有可能报告疫苗的副作用(收到手册后为63%,之前为55%,无显著差异),但倾向于使他们向非医疗保健提供者获取信息的可能性降低(收到手册后为58%,之前为69%,χ2 = 3.73,P = .06)。然而,收到手册的家长更常表示他们收到的信息过多(20% 对4%,χ2 = 14.9,P < .001)。

结论

疫苗信息手册增强了家长对免疫接种的了解和接受度。仍有进一步改进的空间。

相似文献

1
Parents' responses to vaccine information pamphlets.家长对疫苗信息手册的反应。
Pediatrics. 1994 Mar;93(3):369-72.
2
Vaccine information pamphlets: more information than parents want?
Pediatrics. 1995 Mar;95(3):331-4.
3
The influence of provider behavior, parental characteristics, and a public policy initiative on the immunization status of children followed by private pediatricians: a study from Pediatric Research in Office Settings.医疗服务提供者行为、家长特征及一项公共政策举措对由私立儿科医生随访的儿童免疫接种状况的影响:一项来自门诊儿科研究的报告
Pediatrics. 1997 Feb;99(2):209-15.
4
Addressing parents' concerns about childhood immunizations: a tutorial for primary care providers.解决家长对儿童免疫接种的担忧:基层医疗服务提供者指南
Pediatrics. 2007 Jul;120(1):18-26. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-2627.
5
Factors that are associated with parental acceptance of human papillomavirus vaccines: a randomized intervention study of written information about HPV.与父母对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接受度相关的因素:一项关于人乳头瘤病毒书面信息的随机干预研究
Pediatrics. 2006 May;117(5):1486-93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1381.
6
Parent comprehension of polio vaccine information pamphlets.家长对脊髓灰质炎疫苗信息手册的理解。
Pediatrics. 1996 Jun;97(6 Pt 1):804-10.
7
Association between health care providers' influence on parents who have concerns about vaccine safety and vaccination coverage.医疗保健提供者对担心疫苗安全性的父母的影响与疫苗接种覆盖率之间的关联。
Pediatrics. 2006 Nov;118(5):e1287-92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-0923.
8
How do physicians immunize their own children? Differences among pediatricians and nonpediatricians.医生如何为自己的孩子接种疫苗?儿科医生与非儿科医生之间的差异。
Pediatrics. 2005 Nov;116(5):e623-33. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-0885.
9
Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.在孩子被诊断为残疾前后满足家长的需求:对一项由关键工作者提供信息、支持和联络的新项目的评估。
Pediatrics. 2004 Oct;114(4):e477-82. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-0240.
10
Homeschooling parents' practices and beliefs about childhood immunizations. homeschooling 父母在儿童免疫接种方面的实践和信念。
Vaccine. 2012 Feb 1;30(6):1149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.12.019. Epub 2011 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Natural Language Processing-Powered Real-Time Monitoring Solution for Vaccine Sentiments and Hesitancy on Social Media: System Development and Validation.用于社交媒体上疫苗情绪和犹豫态度的自然语言处理驱动的实时监测解决方案:系统开发与验证
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Jun 21;12:e57164. doi: 10.2196/57164.
2
Electronic Package Leaflets for Vaccines: What Are People's Perceptions in Italy?疫苗的电子包装说明书:意大利民众有何看法?
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Jul 4;10(7):1075. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10071075.
3
Development, theoretical framework, and evaluation of a parent and teacher-delivered intervention on adolescent vaccination.
一项由家长和教师实施的青少年疫苗接种干预措施的开发、理论框架及评估
Health Promot Pract. 2014 Jul;15(4):556-67. doi: 10.1177/1524839913518222. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
4
Attitudes and beliefs of parents concerned about vaccines: impact of timing of immunization information.家长对疫苗的态度和信念:免疫信息时间的影响。
Pediatrics. 2011 May;127 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S120-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-1722R. Epub 2011 Apr 18.
5
Factors influencing African-American mothers' concerns about immunization safety: a summary of focus group findings.影响非裔美国母亲对免疫接种安全性担忧的因素:焦点小组结果总结
J Natl Med Assoc. 2005 May;97(5):657-66.
6
Parents' understanding of the CDC's vaccine information material.家长对美国疾病控制与预防中心疫苗信息资料的理解。
Am J Public Health. 1996 Nov;86(11):1648-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.86.11.1648.