• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴尔的摩治疗设备工作模拟器:健康男性三种附件的生物力学和生理规范

The Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment work simulator: biomechanical and physiological norms for three attachments in healthy men.

作者信息

Bhambhani Y, Esmail S, Brintnell S

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

出版信息

Am J Occup Ther. 1994 Jan;48(1):19-25. doi: 10.5014/ajot.48.1.19.

DOI:10.5014/ajot.48.1.19
PMID:8116780
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment (BTE) work simulator is routinely used by occupational therapists in functional capacity evaluation. Currently, there is a lack of normative data for various attachments on this instrument. The purposes of this study were to (a) establish norms for the biomechanical and physiological responses during three tasks on the BTE work simulator, namely, wheel-turn, push-pull, and overhead-reach; (b) compare these responses during the three tasks, and (c) examine the interrelationships of these responses during the tasks.

METHOD

Twenty healthy men completed five testing sessions: (a) task familiarization on the BTE work simulator to identify the work intensity, which was perceived as hard on the Borg scale; (b) an incremental arm ergometer exercise test to determine their peak oxygen uptake (pVO2) and peak heart rate (pHR); and (c) one of the three tasks on the BTE work simulator for 4 min in each of the next three sessions.

RESULTS

Analysis of variance indicated that torque, work, and power during the overhead-reach were significantly higher (p = .000) compared with the wheel-turn and push-pull tasks. However, no significant differences (p > .05) were observed among the tasks for the VO2 and HR, which were approximately 50% and 70% of pVO2 and pHR respectively. Although there was a significant relationship (p < .05) among tasks for the torque, work, and power, the common variance ranged only between 38% and 67%. The relative pVO2 was significantly related to work (p = .028) and power (p = .027) only during the push-pull task but not the wheel-turn and overhead-reach tasks.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that occupational therapists should include as many tasks as possible when designing functional capacity evaluation test batteries, and that there is no consistent relationship between cardiorespiratory fitness and performance of various tasks on the BTE work simulator.

摘要

目的

职业治疗师在功能能力评估中经常使用巴尔的摩治疗设备(BTE)工作模拟器。目前,该仪器各种附件缺乏规范数据。本研究的目的是:(a)建立BTE工作模拟器上三项任务(即轮转、推拉和过顶伸展)期间生物力学和生理反应的规范;(b)比较这三项任务期间的这些反应;(c)检查任务期间这些反应的相互关系。

方法

20名健康男性完成了五次测试:(a)在BTE工作模拟器上进行任务熟悉,以确定工作强度,在博格量表上被认为是高强度;(b)进行递增式手臂测力计运动测试,以确定他们的峰值摄氧量(pVO2)和峰值心率(pHR);(c)在接下来的三次测试中,每次在BTE工作模拟器上进行三项任务之一,持续4分钟。

结果

方差分析表明,与轮转和推拉任务相比,过顶伸展期间的扭矩、功和功率显著更高(p = .000)。然而,VO2和HR在任务之间未观察到显著差异(p > .05),分别约为pVO2和pHR的50%和70%。尽管扭矩、功和功率在任务之间存在显著关系(p < .),但共同方差仅在38%至67%之间。仅在推拉任务期间,相对pVO2与功(p = .028)和功率(p = .027)显著相关,而在轮转和过顶伸展任务中则不然。

结论

这些结果表明,职业治疗师在设计功能能力评估测试组时应包括尽可能多的任务,并且心肺适能与BTE工作模拟器上各种任务的表现之间没有一致的关系。

相似文献

1
The Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment work simulator: biomechanical and physiological norms for three attachments in healthy men.巴尔的摩治疗设备工作模拟器:健康男性三种附件的生物力学和生理规范
Am J Occup Ther. 1994 Jan;48(1):19-25. doi: 10.5014/ajot.48.1.19.
2
Gender differences in work performance on the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment work simulator.巴尔的摩治疗设备工作模拟器上工作表现的性别差异。
Am J Occup Ther. 1995 May;49(5):405-11. doi: 10.5014/ajot.49.5.405.
3
Validity of the baltimore therapeutic equipment work simulator in the measurement of lifting endurance in healthy men.
Am J Occup Ther. 2001 Mar-Apr;55(2):184-90. doi: 10.5014/ajot.55.2.184.
4
Grip strength testing using the BTE work simulator and the Jamar dynamometer: a comparative study. Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment.使用BTE工作模拟器和Jamar握力计进行握力测试:一项对比研究。巴尔的摩治疗设备公司。
J Hand Surg Am. 1995 Mar;20(2):293-8. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(05)80029-2.
5
The Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator: reliability and validity at three work intensities.巴尔的摩治疗设备工作模拟器:三种工作强度下的信度和效度
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991 Jun;72(7):511-6.
6
Computer analysis of the performance of the BTE Work Simulator.BTE工作模拟器性能的计算机分析。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1991 May-Jun;12(3):250-6.
7
Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment work simulator: energy expenditure of work activities in cardiac patients.巴尔的摩治疗设备工作模拟器:心脏病人工作活动的能量消耗
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993 Apr;74(4):419-24.
8
Comparison of the strength endurance parameters for the Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment (BTE) Simulator II and the Jamar Handgrip Dynamometer.巴尔的摩治疗设备(BTE)模拟器II与贾马尔握力计的力量耐力参数比较。
Work. 2017;57(1):95-103. doi: 10.3233/WOR-172542.
9
Cardiorespiratory parameters of exercise capacity in a healthy Lithuanian population: the pilot study.健康立陶宛人群运动能力的心肺参数:初步研究。
Hellenic J Cardiol. 2013 Mar-Apr;54(2):107-18.
10
Cardiorespiratory responses of Hi Fit and Low Fit subjects to mental challenge during exercise.高体能和低体能受试者在运动期间对心理挑战的心肺反应。
Int J Sports Med. 2006 Dec;27(12):1013-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-923902. Epub 2006 Apr 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Different Isokinetic Movement Patterns on Shoulder Rehabilitation Outcome.不同等速运动模式对肩部康复效果的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 25;19(17):10623. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710623.
2
Comparisons of physiological and perceptual responses in healthy men and women during standardized arm cranking and task-specific pushing-pulling.健康男性和女性在标准化手臂曲柄运动及特定任务推挽动作过程中的生理和感知反应比较。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006 Jun;79(6):509-20. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0076-1. Epub 2005 Dec 31.
3
Assessment of functional capacity of the musculoskeletal system in the context of work, daily living, and sport: a systematic review.
在工作、日常生活及运动背景下对肌肉骨骼系统功能能力的评估:一项系统综述
J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Jun;15(2):253-72. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-1223-y.
4
Safety issues in functional capacity evaluation: findings from a trial of a new approach for evaluating clients with chronic back pain.功能能力评估中的安全问题:一项评估慢性背痛患者新方法试验的结果
J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Jun;15(2):237-51. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-1222-z.