• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用客观评分系统预测重症监护病房预后的理由。

The case for using objective scoring systems to predict intensive care unit outcome.

作者信息

Watts C M, Knaus W A

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.

出版信息

Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):73-89; discussion 91-2.

PMID:8118734
Abstract

The acceptance and more widespread use of objective probability estimates will depend on addressing several practical issues. Physicians generally are unfamiliar with these estimates, their origin, and how they should be used. Physicians need to understand the conceptual origins of prognostic systems, their strengths and limitations, and their usefulness in helping to resolve uncertainty and improve critical decision making. Better communication and understanding of patient and family preferences and values will be necessary to ensure that the use of numerical predictions will not be the dominant or exclusive consideration. No matter how refined and elaborate these systems become, they represent simplification of even more complex biologic decision-making systems. The predictions must be interpreted carefully and used by trained intensivists, with the constant opportunity to exercise human discretion. The challenge to the developers of these systems will be to improve their accuracy, refine their use with specific disease entities that are important in determining outcome in critical care (e.g. multi-organ system failure, sepsis, adult respiratory distress syndrome), improve display of data and ease of data capture with automated systems, and construct data-bases and predictive equations that are fluid, constantly growing, and adjusting to capture developments in medical care.

摘要

客观概率估计的被接受程度及其更广泛的应用将取决于解决几个实际问题。医生通常不熟悉这些估计、其来源以及应如何使用它们。医生需要了解预后系统的概念起源、其优势和局限性,以及它们在帮助解决不确定性和改善关键决策方面的有用性。为确保数值预测的使用不会成为主要或唯一的考虑因素,更好地沟通和理解患者及家属的偏好和价值观将是必要的。无论这些系统变得多么精细和复杂,它们都代表着对更为复杂的生物决策系统的简化。预测必须由训练有素的重症监护医生仔细解读并使用,且始终要有行使人为判断力的机会。这些系统的开发者面临的挑战将是提高其准确性,针对在重症监护中对确定预后很重要的特定疾病实体(如多器官系统衰竭、脓毒症、成人呼吸窘迫综合征)优化其使用,通过自动化系统改善数据显示和数据采集的便捷性,并构建灵活、不断增长且能适应医疗护理发展的数据库和预测方程。

相似文献

1
The case for using objective scoring systems to predict intensive care unit outcome.使用客观评分系统预测重症监护病房预后的理由。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):73-89; discussion 91-2.
2
Objective data and quality assurance programs. Current and future trends.客观数据与质量保证计划。当前及未来趋势。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):157-77.
3
Predicting intensive care unit outcome with scoring systems. Underlying concepts and principles.用评分系统预测重症监护病房的预后。基本概念和原则。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):1-18.
4
Errors and bias in using predictive scoring systems.使用预测评分系统时的误差与偏差。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):53-72.
5
The rationing of intensive care.重症监护的资源分配
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):135-43.
6
Why severity models should be used with caution.为何应谨慎使用严重程度模型。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):93-110; discussion 111-5.
7
The use of intensive care unit severity scoring systems in reimbursement strategies.
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):145-56.
8
The ethical appropriateness of using prognostic scoring systems in clinical management.在临床管理中使用预后评分系统的伦理适宜性。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):229-41.
9
A qualitative analysis of how advanced practice nurses use clinical decision support systems.对高级执业护士如何使用临床决策支持系统的定性分析。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 Dec;19(12):652-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00266.x.
10
Improving end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: what's to be learned from outcomes research?改善重症监护病房的临终关怀:从结局研究中能学到什么?
New Horiz. 1998 Feb;6(1):110-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Objective, Structured Proforma to Score the Merit of Scientific Presentations.用于评估科学报告价值的客观结构化格式。
Indian J Surg. 2015 Dec;77(Suppl 3):1001-4. doi: 10.1007/s12262-014-1107-5. Epub 2014 May 26.
2
Adaptation of Predictive Models to PDA Hand-Held Devices.预测模型在 PDA 手持设备中的应用。
West J Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;9(1):13-9.
3
Decision support in multi-professional communication.多专业沟通中的决策支持。
J Med Syst. 2009 Feb;33(1):59-65. doi: 10.1007/s10916-008-9164-6.
4
Bench-to-bedside review: outcome predictions for critically ill patients in the emergency department.从实验室到临床的综述:急诊科危重症患者的预后预测
Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):376-83. doi: 10.1186/cc3518. Epub 2005 Apr 18.
5
[Value of the Hannover Intensive Score (HIS) in internal medicine intensive care].[汉诺威内科重症监护评分(HIS)在内科重症监护中的价值]
Med Klin (Munich). 1998 Sep 15;93(9):524-32. doi: 10.1007/BF03042661.
6
Trends from the United States with end of life decisions in the intensive care unit.美国重症监护病房临终决策的趋势。
Intensive Care Med. 1993;19(6):316-22. doi: 10.1007/BF01694704.