• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用预测评分系统时的误差与偏差。

Errors and bias in using predictive scoring systems.

作者信息

Cowen J S, Kelley M A

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia.

出版信息

Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):53-72.

PMID:8118733
Abstract

Scoring systems used to predict clinical outcomes for critically ill patients have been refined in the past decade, yet even the most recently developed systems contain flaws that limit their application. In general, prediction rules are derived by defining an association between a number of clinical variables and a particular outcome in a reference patient population. By systematically examining the qualities of the independent variables and the size and scope of the derivation data set, potential sources of error and bias can be identified. Existing and future predictive systems must be validated on large groups of patients and continuously updated to keep pace with new approaches to the practice of critical care medicine.

摘要

在过去十年中,用于预测重症患者临床结局的评分系统已得到完善,但即使是最新开发的系统也存在一些缺陷,限制了它们的应用。一般来说,预测规则是通过定义一组临床变量与参考患者群体中特定结局之间的关联来推导的。通过系统地检查自变量的质量以及推导数据集的大小和范围,可以识别潜在的误差和偏差来源。现有的和未来的预测系统必须在大量患者群体上进行验证,并不断更新,以跟上危重症医学实践的新方法。

相似文献

1
Errors and bias in using predictive scoring systems.使用预测评分系统时的误差与偏差。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):53-72.
2
Predicting intensive care unit outcome with scoring systems. Underlying concepts and principles.用评分系统预测重症监护病房的预后。基本概念和原则。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):1-18.
3
The case against using the APACHE system to predict intensive care unit outcome in trauma patients.反对使用急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)预测创伤患者重症监护病房治疗结果的理由。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):117-26; discussion 127-34.
4
The case for using objective scoring systems to predict intensive care unit outcome.使用客观评分系统预测重症监护病房预后的理由。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):73-89; discussion 91-2.
5
Why severity models should be used with caution.为何应谨慎使用严重程度模型。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):93-110; discussion 111-5.
6
Severity-of-illness scoring systems and models: neurological and neurosurgical intensive care units.疾病严重程度评分系统与模型:神经科及神经外科重症监护病房
Neurol India. 2001 Jun;49 Suppl 1:S91-4.
7
Statistical approaches to development and validation of predictive instruments.
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):19-35.
8
The ethical appropriateness of using prognostic scoring systems in clinical management.在临床管理中使用预后评分系统的伦理适宜性。
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):229-41.
9
The rationing of intensive care.重症监护的资源分配
Crit Care Clin. 1994 Jan;10(1):135-43.
10
A qualitative analysis of how advanced practice nurses use clinical decision support systems.对高级执业护士如何使用临床决策支持系统的定性分析。
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007 Dec;19(12):652-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00266.x.

引用本文的文献

1
[Comparison of different prediction models for the occurrence of nausea and vomiting in the postoperative phase : A systematic qualitative comparison based on prospectively defined quality indicators].术后恶心呕吐发生的不同预测模型比较:基于前瞻性定义质量指标的系统定性比较
Anaesthesiologie. 2024 Apr;73(4):251-262. doi: 10.1007/s00101-024-01386-5. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
2
Enabling Timely Medical Intervention by Exploring Health-Related Multivariate Time Series with a Hybrid Attentive Model.利用混合注意力模型探索与健康相关的多元时间序列,实现及时的医疗干预。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Aug 15;22(16):6104. doi: 10.3390/s22166104.
3
Sequential organ failure assessment scoring and prediction of patient's outcome in Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary care hospital.
三级医院重症监护病房中序贯器官衰竭评估评分及患者预后预测
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Jul-Sep;32(3):364-8. doi: 10.4103/0970-9185.168165.
4
Validation of acute physiologic and chronic health evaluation II scoring system software developed at The Aga Khan University, Pakistan.对巴基斯坦阿迦汗大学开发的急性生理与慢性健康评估II评分系统软件的验证。
Saudi J Anaesth. 2016 Jan-Mar;10(1):45-9. doi: 10.4103/1658-354X.169474.
5
Scoring Systems in Assessing Survival of Critically Ill ICU Patients.评估重症监护病房(ICU)重症患者生存率的评分系统
Med Sci Monit. 2015 Sep 4;21:2621-9. doi: 10.12659/MSM.894153.
6
Severity of acute illness is associated with baseline readiness to change in medical intensive care unit patients with unhealthy alcohol use.急性病严重程度与重症加强护理病房中存在不健康饮酒行为的患者的基线改变准备情况有关。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012 Mar;36(3):544-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01648.x. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
7
60-year-old man with rash.一名60岁的男性患有皮疹。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 Sep;84(9):838-41. doi: 10.4065/84.9.838.
8
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II in predicting hospital mortality of neurosurgical intensive care unit patients.急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估II及简化急性生理学评分II在预测神经外科重症监护病房患者医院死亡率中的应用
J Korean Med Sci. 2009 Jun;24(3):420-6. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2009.24.3.420. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
9
A comparison of admission and worst 24-hour Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores in predicting hospital mortality: a retrospective cohort study.入院时与最严重24小时急性生理与慢性健康状况评估II评分在预测医院死亡率方面的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Crit Care. 2006 Feb;10(1):R4. doi: 10.1186/cc3913.