Stewart J W, McGrath P J, Quitkin F M, Rabkin J G, Harrison W, Wager S, Nunes E, Ocepek-Welikson K, Tricamo E
New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1993 Dec;13(6):391-6.
We reanalyzed data from a larger, previously published study in order to directly address whether very chronically depressed patients could benefit from antidepressant medications. This study entered 598 depressed patients into a study randomizing patients to 6 weeks of double-blind treatment with imipramine, phenelzine, or placebo. Patients were assessed for chronicity on a four-point scale from "mostly well" to "virtually always depressed." The current analyses include only the 153 study completers who were rated as "virtually always depressed." In these patients, imipramine was effective for significantly more patients than was placebo (22 [46%] of 48 responding to imipramine vs. 9 [17%] of 52 responding to placebo; chi 2 = 9.50; p = 0.002), whereas phenelzine was significantly more effective than imipramine (37 [70%] of 53 responding to phenelzine; chi 2 = 5.96; p = .015). Patients with mild depression, early onset, or histories of panic attacks did not have substantially different outcomes than patients without these characteristics. These findings suggest that some chronically depressed patients may be good candidates for treatment with antidepressant medication. Because the majority (80%) of the sample met Columbia criteria for definite or probable atypical depression, too few chronic depressives were available to evaluate separately antidepressant efficacy in chronically depressed outpatients who did not have atypical depression. Hence, these results may be applicable only to patients with atypical depression.
我们重新分析了来自一项规模更大、先前已发表研究的数据,以便直接探讨长期严重抑郁的患者是否能从抗抑郁药物中获益。该研究纳入了598名抑郁症患者,将患者随机分为接受6周丙咪嗪、苯乙肼或安慰剂双盲治疗的三组。根据从“基本良好”到“几乎一直抑郁”的四点量表对患者的慢性程度进行评估。当前分析仅包括153名被评为“几乎一直抑郁”的研究完成者。在这些患者中,丙咪嗪治疗有效的患者显著多于安慰剂组(48名对丙咪嗪有反应的患者中有22名[46%],而52名对安慰剂有反应的患者中有9名[17%];卡方检验χ2 = 9.50;p = 0.002),而苯乙肼比丙咪嗪显著更有效(53名对苯乙肼有反应的患者中有37名[70%];卡方检验χ2 = 5.96;p = 0.015)。伴有轻度抑郁、起病较早或有惊恐发作史的患者与没有这些特征的患者相比,结局没有实质性差异。这些发现表明,一些长期抑郁的患者可能是抗抑郁药物治疗的合适人选。由于样本中的大多数(80%)符合哥伦比亚明确或可能非典型抑郁症的标准,可供单独评估非非典型抑郁症的长期抑郁门诊患者抗抑郁疗效的长期抑郁症患者太少。因此,这些结果可能仅适用于非典型抑郁症患者。