• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

III期结肠癌的辅助治疗:经济学回归研究与治疗的成本效益

Adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer: economics returns to research and cost-effectiveness of treatment.

作者信息

Brown M L, Nayfield S G, Shibley L M

机构信息

Applied Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Mar 16;86(6):424-30. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.6.424.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/86.6.424
PMID:8120916
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 1989, the National Cancer Institute issued a clinical announcement advising physicians of the benefits of combined levamisole and fluorouracil as an adjuvant treatment for patients with stage III colon cancer.

PURPOSE

We have estimated the cost-effectiveness of the combined treatment and estimated the social return on the National Institutes of Health (NIH) research investment that led to this innovative cancer treatment.

METHODS

A computer simulation model, CAN*TROL, was used to estimate costs and benefits for a population cross-section receiving the adjuvant treatment. A method similar to "Q-TWiST" was used to assess the impact of quality-of-life adjustments.

RESULTS

For a typical base-line case, the calculated cost-effectiveness is a very favorable $2094 per year of life saved. Using a variety of less favorable assumptions, cost-effectiveness is still less than $5000 per year of life saved, again a favorable value. Quality-of-life adjustments have a negligible effect on the cost-effectiveness outcome. The net present value of the return to the NIH research investment is estimated to be $1.66 billion.

CONCLUSIONS

Under a wide range of reasonable assumptions, adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer appears to be a very cost-effective procedure. The investment in the research that resulted in this therapy promises to yield a high return.

摘要

背景

1989年,美国国立癌症研究所发布了一项临床公告,告知医生左旋咪唑与氟尿嘧啶联合使用作为III期结肠癌患者辅助治疗的益处。

目的

我们评估了联合治疗的成本效益,并估算了美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)促成这种创新癌症治疗方法的研究投资的社会回报。

方法

使用计算机模拟模型CAN*TROL来估算接受辅助治疗的人群横截面的成本和效益。采用一种类似于“质量调整生命年(Q-TWiST)”的方法来评估生活质量调整的影响。

结果

对于典型的基线病例,计算出的成本效益为每挽救一年生命2094美元,非常可观。使用各种不太有利的假设,成本效益仍低于每挽救一年生命5000美元,这也是一个有利的值。生活质量调整对成本效益结果的影响可忽略不计。NIH研究投资回报的净现值估计为16.6亿美元。

结论

在广泛的合理假设下,III期结肠癌的辅助治疗似乎是一种非常具有成本效益的方法。促成这种治疗方法的研究投资有望产生高回报。

相似文献

1
Adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer: economics returns to research and cost-effectiveness of treatment.III期结肠癌的辅助治疗:经济学回归研究与治疗的成本效益
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994 Mar 16;86(6):424-30. doi: 10.1093/jnci/86.6.424.
2
Cost effectiveness of adding folinic acid to fluorouracil plus levamisole as adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colon cancer in Germany.在德国,结肠癌患者中在氟尿嘧啶加左旋咪唑基础上加用亚叶酸作为辅助化疗的成本效益。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(10):709-19. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321100-00003.
3
A cost-utility approach to the use of 5-fluorouracil and levamisole as adjuvant chemotherapy for Dukes' C colonic carcinoma.
Med J Aust. 1993 Mar 1;158(5):319-22. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb121787.x.
4
Pharmacoeconomic analysis of capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer in Taiwan.卡培他滨与氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙作为辅助治疗台湾 III 期结肠癌的药物经济学分析。
Value Health. 2011 Jul-Aug;14(5):647-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
5
Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant FOLFOX therapy for stage III colon cancer in Japan based on the MOSAIC trial.基于 MOSAIC 试验的日本 III 期结肠癌辅助 FOLFOX 治疗的成本效益。
Value Health. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):255-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.10.006. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of oxaliplatin compared with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer in the US.美国奥沙利铂与5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸钙辅助治疗III期结肠癌的成本效益分析
Cancer. 2007 Mar 15;109(6):1082-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22512.
7
A cost-utility approach to the use of 5-fluorouracil and levamisole as adjuvant chemotherapy for Dukes' C colonic carcinoma.
Med J Aust. 1993 Jun 21;158(12):866. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1993.tb137685.x.
8
Cost-utility analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer in Thailand.泰国III期结肠癌患者辅助化疗的成本效用分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(4):687-700. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2015.972379. Epub 2014 Oct 18.
9
Cost effectiveness of adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1996 Dec;23(4):269-74. doi: 10.1097/00004836-199612000-00006.
10
Comparative and cost-effectiveness of oxaliplatin-based or irinotecan-based regimens compared with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin alone among US elderly stage IV colon cancer patients.美国老年 IV 期结肠癌患者中奥沙利铂或伊立替康为基础的方案与 5-氟尿嘧啶/亚叶酸单独治疗的比较和成本效益。
Cancer. 2012 Jun 15;118(12):3173-81. doi: 10.1002/cncr.26613. Epub 2011 Oct 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Health economic evidence for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II and III colon cancer: a systematic review.II期和III期结肠癌辅助化疗的卫生经济学证据:一项系统评价。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023 Jan 31;21(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12962-023-00422-2.
2
Evaluating cancer research impact: lessons and examples from existing reviews on approaches to research impact assessment.评估癌症研究的影响:现有研究影响评估方法综述的经验教训与实例
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Mar 11;19(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-00658-x.
3
Health Technology Assessment as a Priority-Setting Tool for Universal Health Coverage: The Call for Global Action at the Prince Mahidol Award Conference 2016.
作为全民健康覆盖优先事项设定工具的卫生技术评估:2016年玛希敦王子奖会议上的全球行动呼吁
Pharmacoeconomics. 2016 Jan;34(1):1-3. doi: 10.1007/s40273-015-0360-1.
4
Systematic review of methods for evaluating healthcare research economic impact.系统评价医疗保健研究经济影响评估方法。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2010 Mar 2;8:6. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-8-6.
5
Preference values associated with stage III colon cancer and adjuvant chemotherapy.与 III 期结肠癌和辅助化疗相关的偏好值。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Apr;19(3):391-400. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9589-5.
6
Cost effectiveness of pharmacogenetic testing for uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 before irinotecan administration for metastatic colorectal cancer.在转移性结直肠癌患者接受伊立替康治疗前,对尿苷二磷酸葡萄糖醛酸基转移酶1A1进行药物遗传学检测的成本效益分析。
Cancer. 2009 Sep 1;115(17):3858-67. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24428.
7
Differences among the elderly in the treatment costs of colorectal cancer: how important is race?老年人大肠癌治疗费用的差异:种族有多重要?
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5):420-30. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000257184.93944.80.
8
Screening, prevention and socioeconomic costs associated with the treatment of colorectal cancer.与结直肠癌治疗相关的筛查、预防及社会经济成本。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(17):1213-38. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321170-00001.
9
Management of colorectal cancer in elderly patients: focus on the cost of chemotherapy.老年患者结直肠癌的管理:关注化疗费用
Drugs Aging. 2004;21(2):113-33. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200421020-00004.
10
Benefit valuation in economic evaluation of cancer therapies. A systematic review of the published literature.癌症治疗经济评估中的效益估值:已发表文献的系统综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Jul;16(1):17-31. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916010-00003.