• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与 III 期结肠癌和辅助化疗相关的偏好值。

Preference values associated with stage III colon cancer and adjuvant chemotherapy.

机构信息

University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2010 Apr;19(3):391-400. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9589-5.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-010-9589-5
PMID:20084462
Abstract

PURPOSE

To elicit preference values for health states associated with Stage III colon cancer (CRC) and to explore the effect of neuropathy associated with current adjuvant treatment.

METHODS

We used time trade-off (TTO) techniques to elicit preferences from 49 CRC patients and 49 community members. We elicited preferences for 7 health states: remission; adjuvant therapy with no, mild, moderate, and severe neuropathy; metastatic stable; and metastatic progressive disease. Mean TTO values were adjusted for the covariates age, education, and current health.

RESULTS

Patients' adjusted mean TTO value for remission was 0.83; adjuvant chemotherapy health states ranged from 0.48 to 0.61. Significant differences were observed for both patient and community groups between TTO for remission and all adjuvant health states (P < 0.001), and between adjuvant therapy with no neuropathy and metastatic health states (P < or = 0.001). Across all health states, patients' values were on average 0.12 higher than community members (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings highlight the trade-offs between the disutility of adjuvant treatment, the higher utility of remission, and the severe utility loss during metastatic disease. The preference values obtained from this study will be useful for informing patients' treatment decisions and payer cost-utility analyses of adjuvant treatment for colon cancer.

摘要

目的

确定与 III 期结肠癌(CRC)相关的健康状态的偏好值,并探讨与当前辅助治疗相关的神经病变的影响。

方法

我们使用时间权衡(TTO)技术从 49 名 CRC 患者和 49 名社区成员中获得偏好。我们对 7 种健康状态进行了偏好评估:缓解;无、轻度、中度和重度神经病变的辅助治疗;转移性稳定;转移性进行性疾病。对年龄、教育和当前健康状况等协变量进行了 TTO 值的调整。

结果

患者缓解的调整后 TTO 值平均值为 0.83;辅助化疗健康状态范围为 0.48 至 0.61。患者和社区组之间在缓解和所有辅助健康状态之间(P<0.001),以及无神经病变的辅助治疗与转移性健康状态之间(P<或=0.001)都观察到了显著差异。在所有健康状态下,患者的价值平均比社区成员高 0.12(P<0.05)。

结论

这些发现强调了辅助治疗的不适、缓解的更高效用以及转移性疾病期间严重的效用损失之间的权衡。本研究获得的偏好值将有助于为患者的治疗决策提供信息,并对结肠癌的辅助治疗进行支付者成本效用分析。

相似文献

1
Preference values associated with stage III colon cancer and adjuvant chemotherapy.与 III 期结肠癌和辅助化疗相关的偏好值。
Qual Life Res. 2010 Apr;19(3):391-400. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9589-5.
2
Health state utilities for metastatic breast cancer in Taiwan.台湾转移性乳腺癌的健康状态效用。
Breast. 2020 Jun;51:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.03.001. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
3
Health utility scores of colorectal cancer based on societal preference in Japan.基于日本社会偏好的结直肠癌健康效用评分。
Qual Life Res. 2009 Oct;18(8):1095-103. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9513-z. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
4
Preferences of German melanoma patients for interferon (IFN) α-2b toxicities (the DeCOG "GERMELATOX survey") versus melanoma recurrence to quantify patients' relative values for adjuvant therapy.德国黑色素瘤患者对干扰素(IFN)α-2b毒性(DeCOG“GERMELATOX调查”)与黑色素瘤复发的偏好,以量化患者对辅助治疗的相对价值。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Nov;95(46):e5375. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005375.
5
Health State Values Derived from People with Multiple Sclerosis for a Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measure: Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-Eight Dimensions-Patient Version (MSIS-8D-P).源自多发性硬化症患者的健康状态值,用于特定于疾病的偏好测量:多发性硬化症影响量表-八个维度-患者版(MSIS-8D-P)。
Value Health. 2018 Nov;21(11):1338-1345. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Jun 19.
6
Assessment of Duration and Effects of 3 vs 6 Months of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Stage II Colorectal Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis of the TOSCA Randomized Clinical Trial.高危 II 期结直肠癌辅助化疗 3 个月与 6 个月的持续时间和效果评估:TOSCA 随机临床试验的亚组分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;6(4):547-551. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.6486.
7
Willingness to pay for a QALY based on community member and patient preferences for temporary health states associated with herpes zoster.社区成员和患者对与带状疱疹相关的临时健康状态的偏好为基础的 QALY 的支付意愿。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2009;27(12):1005-16. doi: 10.2165/11314000-000000000-00000.
8
A comparison of methods for converting DCE values onto the full health-dead QALY scale.将DCE值转换到完整的健康-死亡质量调整生命年量表的方法比较。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Apr;35(3):328-40. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14559542. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
9
Impact of patient age and comorbidity on surgeon versus oncologist preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer.患者年龄和合并症对外科医生与肿瘤学家关于III期结肠癌辅助化疗偏好的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2009 Feb;208(2):202-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.10.016. Epub 2008 Dec 18.
10
Cost-utility analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer in Thailand.泰国III期结肠癌患者辅助化疗的成本效用分析。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2015;15(4):687-700. doi: 10.1586/14737167.2015.972379. Epub 2014 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Elicitation of Health State Utilities Associated with Progression from Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) Unresponsive Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC).与卡介苗(BCG)无反应性非肌层浸润性膀胱癌(NMIBC)进展相关的健康状态效用值的获取
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 May;7(3):469-477. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00392-4. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
Cost-effectiveness of DPYD Genotyping Prior to Fluoropyrimidine-based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer.氟嘧啶类辅助化疗前进行 DPYD 基因分型的成本效益分析:用于结肠癌。
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2022 Sep;21(3):e189-e195. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.05.001. Epub 2022 May 11.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A different approach to health state valuation.一种评估健康状态的不同方法。
Value Health. 2009 Mar;12 Suppl 1:S16-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00517.x.
2
Cancer statistics, 2007.2007年癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Jan-Feb;57(1):43-66. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.57.1.43.
3
How should we pay the piper when he's calling the tune? On the long-term affordability of cancer care in the United States.当吹笛者定好曲调时,我们该如何付费呢?关于美国癌症治疗的长期可负担性。
Cost-utility analysis of apixaban compared with usual care for primary thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients with cancer.
阿哌沙班与常规护理用于门诊癌症患者初级血栓预防的成本-效用分析。
CMAJ. 2021 Oct 12;193(40):E1551-E1560. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.210523.
4
Circulating Tumour DNA as a Potential Cost-Effective Biomarker to Reduce Adjuvant Chemotherapy Overtreatment in Stage II Colorectal Cancer.循环肿瘤 DNA 作为一种潜在的具有成本效益的生物标志物,可减少 II 期结直肠癌的辅助化疗过度治疗。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2021 Aug;39(8):953-964. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01047-0. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
5
Colonoscopy in poorly prepped colons: a cost effectiveness analysis comparing standard of care to a new cleansing technology.肠道准备不佳的结肠的结肠镜检查:比较标准护理与一种新的清洁技术的成本效益分析。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2021 Apr 29;19(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s12962-021-00277-5.
6
Health Utility Book (HUB)-Cancer: Protocol for a Systematic Literature Review of Health State Utility Values in Cancer.健康效用手册(HUB)-癌症:癌症健康状态效用值系统文献综述方案
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Aug 13;4(2):2381468319852594. doi: 10.1177/2381468319852594. eCollection 2019 Jul-Dec.
7
Estimating utility weights and quality-adjusted life year loss for colorectal cancer-related health states in Korea.估算韩国结直肠癌相关健康状况的效用权重和质量调整生命年损失。
Sci Rep. 2017 Jul 17;7(1):5571. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-06004-6.
8
Systematic review of health state utility values for economic evaluation of colorectal cancer.用于结直肠癌经济评价的健康状态效用值的系统评价。
Health Econ Rev. 2016 Dec;6(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13561-016-0115-5. Epub 2016 Aug 19.
9
Cost-effectiveness of pazopanib compared with sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Canada.在加拿大转移性肾细胞癌中,帕唑帕尼与舒尼替尼的成本效益比较。
Curr Oncol. 2016 Aug;23(4):e340-54. doi: 10.3747/co.23.2244. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
10
"Back to the future": Influence of beliefs regarding the future on TTO answers.“回到未来”:关于未来的信念对时间权衡法答案的影响
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016 Jan 12;14:4. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0402-6.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Jan 10;25(2):175-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.08.9805.
4
Exploring challenges to TTO utilities: valuing states worse than dead.探索技术转让办公室(TTO)效用面临的挑战:评估比死亡更糟糕的状态。
Health Econ. 2006 Apr;15(4):393-402. doi: 10.1002/hec.1069.
5
Capecitabine as adjuvant treatment for stage III colon cancer.卡培他滨作为Ⅲ期结肠癌的辅助治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jun 30;352(26):2696-704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043116.
6
Clinical management of oxaliplatin-associated neurotoxicity.奥沙利铂相关神经毒性的临床管理
Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2005 Apr;5 Suppl 1:S38-46. doi: 10.3816/ccc.2005.s.006.
7
US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.美国EQ-5D健康状态的估值:D1估值模型的开发与测试
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):203-20. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003.
8
Correcting biases in standard gamble and time tradeoff utilities.纠正标准博弈和时间权衡效用中的偏差。
Med Decis Making. 2004 Sep-Oct;24(5):511-7. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04268955.
9
Preference assessment method affects decision-analytic recommendations: a prostate cancer treatment example.偏好评估方法会影响决策分析建议:以前列腺癌治疗为例。
Med Decis Making. 2004 Sep-Oct;24(5):504-10. doi: 10.1177/0272989X04268954.
10
The price tag on progress--chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.进步的代价——结直肠癌的化疗
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jul 22;351(4):317-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048143.