Rosenthal M P, Diamond J J, Rabinowitz H K, Bauer L C, Jones R L, Kearl G W, Kelly R B, Sheets K J, Jaffe A, Jonas A P
Department of Family Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia, PA 19107.
JAMA. 1994;271(12):914-7.
To assess the specialty plans of current fourth-year medical students and, for those not choosing primary care specialties, to investigate the potential effect that changes in key economic or lifestyle factors could have in attracting such students to primary care.
A survey study was sent to 901 fourth-year medical students in the 1993 graduating classes of six US medical schools.
Comparisons were made between students choosing and not choosing primary care specialties. For the non-primary care students, we also evaluated whether alteration of income, hours worked, or loan repayment could attract them to primary care careers.
Of the 688 responses (76% response rate), primary care specialties were chosen by 27% of the students and non-primary care specialties by 73%. One quarter (25%) of the non-primary care students indicated they would change to primary care for one of the following factors: income (10%), hours worked (11%), or loan repayment (4%). For students whose debt was $50,000 or greater, the loan repayment option became much more important than for students with lesser debt. In all, a total of 45% (n = 313) of the students indicated either they were planning to enter primary care (n = 188) or they would change to a primary care specialty (n = 125) with appropriate adjustments in income, hours worked, or loan repayment.
Significant changes in economic and lifestyle factors could have a direct effect on the ability to attract students to primary care. Including such changes as part of health system reform, especially within the context of a supportive medical school environment, could enable the United States to approach a goal of graduating 50% generalist physicians.
评估当前四年级医学生的专业规划,并针对那些未选择初级保健专业的学生,调查关键经济因素或生活方式因素的变化在吸引这些学生从事初级保健工作方面可能产生的潜在影响。
对美国六所医学院1993届的901名四年级医学生进行了一项调查研究。
对选择和未选择初级保健专业的学生进行比较。对于非初级保健专业的学生,我们还评估了收入、工作时长或贷款偿还的改变是否能吸引他们从事初级保健职业。
在688份回复中(回复率为76%),27%的学生选择了初级保健专业,73%的学生选择了非初级保健专业。四分之一(25%)的非初级保健专业学生表示,出于以下因素之一他们会转而选择初级保健专业:收入(10%)、工作时长(11%)或贷款偿还(4%)。对于债务为5万美元或更多的学生,贷款偿还选项比债务较少的学生更为重要。总体而言,共有45%(n = 313)的学生表示他们计划进入初级保健领域(n = 188),或者在收入、工作时长或贷款偿还方面做出适当调整后会转而选择初级保健专业(n = 125)。
经济和生活方式因素的显著变化可能会直接影响吸引学生从事初级保健工作的能力。将此类变化纳入卫生系统改革的一部分,尤其是在支持性的医学院校环境背景下,可能会使美国朝着培养50%全科医生的目标迈进。