• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种防护泡沫对刷洗和戴手套的影响。

Effects of a protective foam on scrubbing and gloving.

作者信息

Larson E, Anderson J K, Baxendale L, Bobo L

机构信息

Georgetown University School of Nursing, Washington, DC 20007.

出版信息

Am J Infect Control. 1993 Dec;21(6):297-301. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(93)90386-i.

DOI:10.1016/0196-6553(93)90386-i
PMID:8122801
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the effects of a skin protectant on surgical scrub and glove integrity.

DESIGN

Forty-nine healthy adult volunteers were assigned (12 subjects per group) to apply a protective foam (DermaMed; Benchmark Enterprises, Salt Lake City, Utah) in conjunction with surgical scrub in one of the following formulations: 70% isopropyl alcohol, a liquid detergent base containing 4% chlorhexidine gluconate, a liquid detergent base containing 7.5% povidone-iodine, or a nonantimicrobial liquid soap (control). According to a standard protocol, subjects performed a surgical scrub on 3 days (every other day). Foam was applied after surgical scrub on day 1 and before surgical scrub on day 3. No foam was applied on day 2. Subjects were gloved for 2 hours after surgical scrub.

SETTING

Laboratory setting.

RESULTS

On all test days, there were significant differences in bacterial reduction by products (chlorhexidine gluconate or alcohol > povidone-iodine > control). When controlling for baseline counts and products used, there were no significant differences in colony-forming unit counts on hands with or without foam immediately after scrubbing or at 2 hours after scrub on gloved or ungloved hands, nor were there differences in glove leakage rates when foam was on hands.

CONCLUSIONS

Such protectants can be used without detrimental effects to scrub effectiveness or glove integrity.

摘要

目的

测试一种皮肤保护剂对手术刷洗和手套完整性的影响。

设计

49名健康成年志愿者被分配(每组12名受试者),在以下配方之一的手术刷手中使用一种保护性泡沫(DermaMed;Benchmark Enterprises,盐湖城,犹他州):70%异丙醇、含4%葡萄糖酸氯己定的液体洗涤剂基质、含7.5%聚维酮碘的液体洗涤剂基质或非抗菌液体肥皂(对照)。根据标准方案,受试者在3天内(每隔一天)进行一次手术刷洗。在第1天手术刷洗后和第3天手术刷洗前涂抹泡沫。第2天不涂抹泡沫。受试者在手术刷洗后戴手套2小时。

地点

实验室环境。

结果

在所有测试日,不同产品的细菌减少量存在显著差异(葡萄糖酸氯己定或酒精>聚维酮碘>对照)。在控制基线计数和所使用的产品后,刷洗后立即或戴手套或未戴手套的手在刷洗后2小时,手上有无泡沫时的菌落形成单位计数没有显著差异,手上有泡沫时手套渗漏率也没有差异。

结论

此类保护剂的使用不会对刷洗效果或手套完整性产生不利影响。

相似文献

1
Effects of a protective foam on scrubbing and gloving.一种防护泡沫对刷洗和戴手套的影响。
Am J Infect Control. 1993 Dec;21(6):297-301. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(93)90386-i.
2
An evaluation of five protocols for surgical handwashing in relation to skin condition and microbial counts.关于皮肤状况和微生物计数对五种外科洗手方案的评估。
J Hosp Infect. 1997 May;36(1):49-65. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(97)90090-6.
3
Alcohol for surgical scrubbing?用于手术刷洗的酒精?
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1990 Mar;11(3):139-43. doi: 10.1086/646137.
4
Population kinetics of the skin flora on gloved hands following surgical hand disinfection with 3 propanol-based hand rubs: a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.使用三种基于丙醇的手消毒剂进行外科手消毒后戴手套手上皮肤菌群的群体动力学:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲试验。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;28(3):346-50. doi: 10.1086/510865. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
5
Evaluation of surgical scrub methods for large animal surgeons.大型动物外科医生手术刷手法的评估
Vet Surg. 1997 Sep-Oct;26(5):382-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950x.1997.tb01697.x.
6
Comparison of the antimicrobial efficacy of povidone-iodine, povidone-iodine-ethanol and chlorhexidine gluconate-ethanol surgical scrubs.聚维酮碘、聚维酮碘 - 乙醇及葡萄糖酸氯己定 - 乙醇外科洗手剂抗菌效果的比较
Dermatology. 2006;212 Suppl 1:21-5. doi: 10.1159/000089195.
7
Comparative antibacterial efficacy of a 2-minute surgical scrub with chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone-iodine, and chloroxylenol sponge-brushes.葡萄糖酸氯己定、聚维酮碘和氯二甲苯酚海绵刷进行2分钟外科洗手的抗菌效果比较
Am J Infect Control. 1988 Aug;16(4):173-7. doi: 10.1016/0196-6553(88)90029-6.
8
Preoperative Hand Decontamination in Ophthalmic Surgery: A Comparison of the Removal of Bacteria from Surgeons' Hands by Routine Antimicrobial Scrub versus an Alcoholic Hand Rub.眼科手术中的术前手部消毒:常规抗菌擦洗与酒精擦手对手术医生手部细菌清除效果的比较
Curr Eye Res. 2017 Sep;42(9):1333-1337. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2017.1304559. Epub 2017 May 30.
9
Surgical hand antisepsis-a pilot study comparing povidone iodine hand scrub and alcohol-based chlorhexidine gluconate hand rub.手术手消毒——聚维酮碘手洗和醇基氯己定葡萄糖酸盐手揉搓的初步研究。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2012 Jan;41(1):12-6.
10
Influence of rings on the efficacy of hand sanitization and residual bacterial contamination.戒指对手部消毒效果及细菌残留污染的影响。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;28(3):351-3. doi: 10.1086/510790. Epub 2007 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
S2k-Guideline hand antisepsis and hand hygiene.S2k指南:手部消毒与手部卫生
GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2024 Sep 6;19:Doc42. doi: 10.3205/dgkh000497. eCollection 2024.
2
Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection.外科手消毒以减少手术部位感染。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 22;2016(1):CD004288. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004288.pub3.
3
Practice of skin protection and skin care among German surgeons and influence on the efficacy of surgical hand disinfection and surgical glove perforation.德国外科医生的皮肤保护与皮肤护理实践及其对外科手消毒效果和手术手套穿孔的影响
BMC Infect Dis. 2014 Jun 10;14:315. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-14-315.
4
Hand hygiene practices among community Health Officers in Rivers State, Nigeria.尼日利亚河流州社区卫生官员的手部卫生习惯
Afr Health Sci. 2013 Jun;13(2):507-11. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v13i2.43.
5
Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.手部卫生的流行病学背景以及对用于洗手和擦手的最重要制剂的评估。
Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004 Oct;17(4):863-93, table of contents. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.863-893.2004.